"直接进入Under review，是送审啊？还是在编辑手中，投稿一周了，Under review中，不知道是否送审。"

"Directly entering 'Under review,' does it mean it's under review? Or is it still in the hands of the editor? It has been a week since submission, and it's currently 'Under review,' but I'm not sure if it has been sent for review."

(0) 讚！ | GM-HE

First, the attitude of the editor is very important. If the editor is interested in your research content, the work efficiency will be greatly improved. The tolerance towards comments will also increase, meaning that even if multiple reviewers provide a large number of revision suggestions, they will not reject the paper outright, usually requesting major revisions. In addition, the journal has certain language requirements. GM is indeed a well-established SCI journal, published by Cambridge University Press. However, I always feel that its publicity effect is not significant enough, and the journal is relatively less popular compared to some earth science journals.

(1) 讚！ | 地质郎

Four months after submission, I received major revisions feedback. After two weeks of making the revisions, the paper was directly accepted for publication. The whole process from submission to acceptance took a total of five months. It is a well-established SCI journal with high quality, but its impact factor has consistently remained around 2.4. I hope it can be improved slightly.

(1) 讚！ | 小风

You know the recommended reviewers, haha.

(0) 讚！ | 久久岁月

2019-9-26, submitted. It was revised and resubmitted three times; 2020-10-13, accepted. There is no with editor status for this journal. The status after submission is under review. There were 2 reviewers in total, one of them is the reviewer recommended, the other one was invited by the editor himself. It may be the influence of the pandemic; the work cycle of the editor and reviewers were relatively long. But it was relatively smooth except for the long time.

(0) 讚！ | NEUGEO

I feel very lucky that my first paper is now accepted. The editor was very nice. Initially all our suggested reviewers were from China. The editor asked me to replace some with reviewers from other countries. That took some time. The revision is mainly about improving the language. I didn’t do a good job during the first round, and the editor politely told me to revise the second time. I did and the paper was accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

A very simple journal, but the article must have quality. The third SCI.

(3) 讚！ | 匿名