Well, there's no way around it, new magazines all start like this

(0) 讚！ | Phys112

Don't even think about submitting directly, it's impossible to get through the review process. Currently, only invitations from top-tier contributors are accepted

(0) 讚！ | Phys112

Journals tend to focus more on optics and interdisciplinary studies with other fields. Research related to this can be submitted

(0) 讚！ | 一眼光年

The editorial department is quite strict in terms of innovation and writing review of the manuscript. For the first submission, there were two reviewers, one positive and one negative. However, when the negative reviewer requested another round of review, the editor directly rejected the submission, indicating that the editorial department has very strict requirements for manuscripts. After making significant revisions, the manuscript was resubmitted and went through the first review and major revision process (including two additional reviewers for the second review). Fortunately, it was accepted. Starting from the first submission, a total of four rounds of reviewer submissions were experienced, taking about six months. The reviewer's comments were very helpful in improving the quality of the paper, but the review process was extremely agonizing. After all, this journal has limited publication capacity in a year, so it is considered an honor to have one's paper accepted.

(121) 讚！ | 光电小子

Domestic high-quality journals, after reading several articles published in them, I feel that the quality is very high. Currently, it has just been established for a short period of time, so the number of published articles is relatively small, but this can be understood as every good journal does not have a large number of published articles at the beginning of its establishment. It is not easy for Chinese people to establish such high-quality journals, which indicates that the scientific research capabilities of our country are rapidly improving.

(104) 讚！ | 任游

The paper was rejected due to non-compliance with the required format and inconsistency between the author's name in the manuscript and the submission system (for no apparent reason). Despite making three revisions as requested in the email (even trying a third way of writing the author's name that cannot be determined from the keyboard), the paper was still rejected. The editor seemed to be more concerned about the paper format rather than considering its content, leaving me unsure of what the editor was thinking.

(35) 讚！ | CocoSoul

There are not many domestically produced journals of high quality, and most of them are the backyard of prestigious research groups.

(0) 讚！ | 无法预测

Domestic journals, it's terrifying. 22 articles per year with an impact factor of 19+. Any discerning person can understand what that means, right?

(732) 讚！ | 聪明的米哈伊