It hurts, just got rejected

(0) 讚！ | Lee

After submitting the manuscript for 12 days, still no response. Refused to reject after modifying the format, and did not submit it for review. Please give a straightforward answer

(0) 讚！ | Lee

2023.10.05 submitted to journal
2023.11.05 reject (Editor gave some suggestions, encouraged to revise and resubmit)
2023.12.19 submitted to journal
2023.12.30 under review
2024.02.15 required reviews completed (Two reviewers completed their reviews)
2024.03.01 under review (Third reviewer's review)
2024.04.15 moderate revision (deadline: 05.29)
2024.05.08 submitted to journal+with editor
2024.05.26 accept

(3) 讚！ | 学术小学生~

Rejected on May 24, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

The time has changed, but the status remains as "with editor" on 2024-05-19

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

2024-05-17 The time on the system has changed, but the status remains "submitted to journal."
2024-05-18 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Not feeling well recently. An article was rejected after being submitted to CATENA, followed by STOTEN not even being submitted for review. Hopefully Geoderma will accept it for review!

Submission history:
2024-05-14 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

It usually takes about 1 month after going online to be retrievable

(0) 讚！ | 学术小学生~

No problem, objective!

(0) 讚！ | 萝卜丝2021

Why can't SCI find it???

(0) 讚！ | bbbb

The speed is too slow!

(0) 讚！ | Hanson Li

Is this article really important to you? Or do you think the quality of this magazine is good?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Could you please file an appeal?

(0) 讚！ | Linda

The journal hurt me deeply, I cried for 2 days, and I feel sad every time I think about it. Let me share my experience.

Submitted at the end of October 2023
During the Spring Festival in 2024, the revision was quick, with 2 reviewers, both giving positive feedback, with less than 30 questions in total, and no sharp criticisms; one editor-in-chief (yes, the editor-in-chief, not vice, nor assistant), just asked me to change the title of the article.
On April 10, 2024, one of the two reviewers did not submit any comments, and the other reviewer only raised minor issues in the second revision, such as checking the capitalization and unit writing norms before finalizing the article. Both reviewers agreed to publish the article, but the editor-in-chief asked me to transfer it to a sub-journal of this journal, a second-tier journal with a relatively low impact factor, citing lack of innovation in my article. What???? Shouldn't innovation be considered first in the initial submission and first revision? It took me half a year, can the analysis methods and techniques used half a year ago be compared with those used now? I really can't accept this result, the editor-in-chief vetoed it, very upset, irreversible damage, although I have published several articles, not relying on this one to graduate, but this experience is really a heavy blow. I finally understand why universities often conduct psychological assessments, pursuing a Ph.D. can drive people crazy. So please treat every researcher kindly, submitting papers is not easy, cherish and be grateful for peer reviews, your slight whim may bury many talents, sigh, continue to feel sad

(0) 讚！ | 宋瑞

It's too slow whether it's sending for review or reviewing, the more OA, the slower!

(0) 讚！ | 枫火

Pretty fast, I received feedback from four reviewers in less than two months. There were a lot of comments, and after making revisions, the feedback along with my responses filled several dozen pages, but overall they were quite constructive and professional

(0) 讚！ | wushaoxiong

You have placed plant and soil too far back

(0) 讚！ | mimngming

The agee feeling is approximately equal to STR, worse than Geoderma, and better than CATENA

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

AGE is not how old you are, but how many years of fun you've had

(0) 讚！ | water excel

I dare to rank the journals of soil science for everyone to reference when submitting manuscripts. Please correct me if I'm wrong: 1. SBB; 2. Geoderma; 3. BFS; 4. STR; 5. Catena; 6. International Society of Water and Soil Conservation (ISWCR); 7. Pedosphere; 8. LDD; 9. Plant and Soil; 10. Applied Soil Ecology; 11. European Journal of Soil Science; 12. Journal of Soil and Sediment

(1) 讚！ | 辣条哥

I dare to rank the journals of soil science for everyone's reference for submitting papers. Please correct me if there are any mistakes: 1. sbb; 2. geoderma; 3. bfs; 4. str; 5. catena; 6. International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR); 7. pedosphere; 8. ldd; 9. plant and soil; 10. applied soil ecology; 11. european journal of soil science; 12. journal of soil and sediment

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

The time for "under review" has changed 3 times already, which step is OP slowing down?

(0) 讚！ | 韩朔

I don't know what's wrong, now that it's open source, the speed seems even slower. Maybe it's because there are too many Chinese manuscripts. I submitted it in November 2023, and there is still no news so far. I estimate it will take half a year. Originally, I wanted to spend money to buy time, but now, I have wasted more time and money in vain. I feel quite frustrated

(0) 讚！ | 迷失自我的青椒

So slow, so slow, so slow
This journal is already OA, why is it still progressing so slowly? I'm so frustrated

(0) 讚！ | Linda

This journal is too slow

(0) 讚！ | Linda