When will the final review comments be available?

(0) 讚！ | wuchao342626

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for you to go from Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted to author approval.

(0) 讚！ | jiayouyaa

Does anyone know what the situation is when it says "Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted" for three to four days?

(0) 讚！ | jiayouyaa

Hope for good luck
Contacting Potential Reviewers	2023-03-23 00:38:55
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment	2023-03-23 00:35:09
Associate Editor Assigned	2023-03-23 00:35:09
Waiting for Associate Editor Assignment	2023-03-20 07:37:25
Editor Assigned	2023-03-20 07:37:25
Waiting for Editor Assignment	2023-03-14 10:02:05
Initial Quality Control Complete	2023-03-14 10:02:05
Initial Quality Control Started	2023-03-14 02:25:42
Author Approved Converted Files	 2023-03-14 02:25:42

(1) 讚！ | suvar

The first review took one month, with two minor revisions and one major revision, and the editor requested the minor revisions. 
The second review took one and a half months, with only one reviewer assigned, and the minor revisions were requested.
After the second round of revisions, the manuscript was accepted the next day.
The editor handled it quickly, with a relatively fast speed.

(1) 讚！ | Rlo

May I ask how much is the publication fee for this article, within 25 units of length?

(4) 讚！ | suvar

Can you share the detailed process of submission in the system?

(0) 讚！ | wuchao342626

Can you share the detailed submission process?

(0) 讚！ | wuchao342626

Three reviewers, one rejection, one major revision, one minor revision. The editor suggests resubmission. This journal editor is more cautious and has higher requirements for the quality of journal content.

(2) 讚！ | dafubaba

The manuscript was submitted in early April, and the review comments were received at the end of April. There were one major revision and one rejection, and the editor-in-chief decided to reject it in the end. This journal has a good reputation, and the review speed was very fast. I revised it according to the review comments. I will make persistent efforts!

(6) 讚！ | 非常欧尚

The article was submitted on January 14, and the decision letter was received on March 27; it took two months and a half. There were two reviewers, one required major revision, and the other one rejected it, and it was finally rejected. The main problem is that the innovation is not outstanding. There were 18 or 19 specific questions raised. G3's academic reputation is still very good. I failed this time, and it must be ready next time before submission. Everyone encourages.

(11) 讚！ | Shawn001

Review is fast at this journal. Highly recommend! This was my second SCI paper. We submitted in mid-September 2017, and received the review comments after a little more than 40 days. Two reviewers, one suggested revision and re-submission, and the other suggested major revision. The editor’s decision was revision and re-submission. After more than a month, we resubmitted the revised paper and the review was again about three months. The same two reviewers, one suggested major revision, and the other suggested minor revision, and the editor’s decision was minor revision. After revision, it was accepted within a week. Although the reviewer who suggested revision and re-submission doesn’t work in this field, the comments were pertinent and a great help in improving my paper. Overall, review is relatively fast, and the reviewers are knowledgeable.

(1) 讚！ | 1028890156@qq.com

The manuscript gave a big change, the editor is still very nice

(1) 讚！ | wukaitwo@163.com

Editor-in-Chief has not been suitable for ten minutes to reject the manuscript. The speed is very fast.

(1) 讚！ | seismo

The research content is beyond the scope of the journal, the editor is second, and the speed is really fast.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous