I received feedback from three reviewers, one of whom completed their review very early, while the other two went MIA. It has been 13 months and the editor had to make a decision without their input. Now, after major revisions, I have been waiting in the "with editor" status for almost three months. It's too slow!

(0) 讚！ | fuzzy neural

How are you doing now? I have been waiting for 7 months for the submission, and it is still under review. In fact, only one reviewer has completed the review, and the second reviewer seems to be missing. It has been several months and still no feedback. Sigh, I thought it would be slow, but not this slow

(0) 讚！ | L1122

Incredibly slow, it took 13 months for the first review, and after revisions, the request to the reviewer to complete the review with the editor has remained unchanged for two and a half months. I wonder if anyone else is slower than me!

(0) 讚！ | fuzzy neural

The content of this journal is not very interesting

(1) 讚！ | 纳维

Just normal

(0) 讚！ | Guass fuzzy

The "with editor" status has not changed for nearly a month. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | L1122

Is it not normal for a mathematics journal to take 10 months for the first review? I don't understand, just talking nonsense.

(0) 讚！ | Guass fuzzy

Is there no "under review" in the first trial?

(0) 讚！ | aaa2

The two reviewers gave positive feedback and were very enthusiastic. However, the Associate Editor (AE) mentioned that the framework structure is incorrect and theoretically unacceptable. But just a slight modification can resolve this issue. In the past, articles have been handled in a similar way, so it is possible that the AE is being overly meticulous. However, the review period is still acceptable; two and a half months is not too long.

(0) 讚！ | M_ZY

FSS is becoming increasingly difficult to publish. The submission was made in November and received two reviewers who are clearly experts in the field. They provided constructive feedback and suggestions.
2020-11-28 Submitted to Journal
2020-11-30 With Editor
2021-5-28 Major Revision
2021-6-8   With Editor
2021-6-11 Under Review
2021-7-1  Under Review
2021-10-27  Required Reviewer Completed
2021-10-27  Decision in Process (Minor Revision)
2021-10.28  Revision Submitted to Journal
2021-10-28  Editor Invited
2021-10-28  Decision in Process
2021-10-28  Accept

(5) 讚！ | Guass fuzzy

Both IEEE TFS and TFS are top journals in the field of fuzzy control. The reviewers' comments are very professional, indicating that they are leading experts in the field. After making thorough revisions according to the reviewers' comments, the revised manuscript should be submitted three months later, and acceptance will be confirmed two months after that. The timeline is provided for reference: 2021.1.08 (submission) - 3.08 (major revisions) - 6.08 (submission of revised manuscript) - 2021.8.08 (Accept).

(57) 讚！ | 10+SCI

The two reviewers are both influential figures in the field and have high expectations for innovation. They were quite satisfied with the revised manuscript and have granted acceptance.

(63) 讚！ | Guass fuzzy

Tragedy of one year and twenty-seven days for the first review. Two reviewers, R#1: doubts about the novelty of the proposed method; R#2: deletion of some non-essential elements.

(Basic) I have previously published a top-tier paper in this emerging field, and this article is also based on my previous work (identifying the shortcomings of existing methods in a certain aspect and comparing them with existing algorithms; the entire article analyzes and discusses the novelty of the proposed method).

Overall, both reviewers are talking nonsense (the editor's choice of reviewers is not from the relevant field of expertise), and they are only pointing out trivial issues, and most importantly, they are wrong. I want to ask, can you understand the article? If you don't understand, it's okay, don't make baseless comments and give misleading guidance. What are you questioning? Haven't seen it, so shut up. Also, the editor's handling time is also disappointing. Think twice before submitting!!!!

(678) 讚！ | aidooooo

It has been over seven months since the submission, and it is still in the "under review" status. Sigh, I want to remind them to review it, but I heard that pushing too hard might lead to rejection.

(6) 讚！ | ren fangmin

2019-08-18, successfully submitted; submitted to journal; 2019-08-19, editor invited; 2019-08-28, with editor; 2019-09-09, under review; 2019-09-20, under review; 2019-10-09, under review; 2019-12-06, completed reject.

(0) 讚！ | tpy759617

It is a top journal of fuzzy sets. The editors are all experts in the field, and the reviewers are basically outstanding achievers in various fields. However, the acceptance rate is low, estimated to be only 10%–20%. The articles are mainly about mathematical theories, the review period is long, and some articles were only accepted more than two years later. The other top journal of fuzzy set theory, IEEE Fuzzy Systems, is biased towards engineering. The two journals complement each other and are highly recognized in the industry.

(125) 讚！ | 模糊logic

A top journal in fuzzy sets. It focuses on the basic theory and mathematical model of fuzzy sets. The quality of the articles is relatively high and it is difficult to publish an article in it. Judging from the articles in recent years, the quality of the articles is better than that of IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. The articles with several simulation diagrams and simulation algorithms can be published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. The impact factor is raised by cross-reference, and the quality is really poor.

(338) 讚！ | Fuzzy sets

The quality requirements of the journals are getting higher and higher. After waiting for 4 months, they have been placed in the editor's hands, and they were rejected without submitting the trial.The conclusion is that the theoretical framework is doing very well, but it lacks the support of the application.Privately think that the journal's innovative requirements for manuscripts are still very high. If it is a kind of paper that extends others' work, it is difficult to be recognized by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Many of the reviewers of this journal are big cattle in the field, and the quality of the articles is high!The opinions given in each rework are very professional and relevant.According to this opinion, even if it is not, it will greatly improve the quality of the article.

(5) 讚！ | fuzzy

The article level in this journal is very general, it should be divided into 3 districts.

(2) 讚！ | 模糊模糊

16After October, the submission of the draft was given a repair after 5 months, before and after the experience of three repairs and 17 years of May was received

(3) 讚！ | hepeng

15After May, the submission of the draft was given four months later, before and after the experience of three repairs and 16 years of September was received

(3) 讚！ | beiju

has been rejected, very sad reminder, but the review speed is still very fast, and the editor has refused to give two reasons for overhaul.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

The top journal of fuzzy mathematics, focusing on theoretical research, another Yiee on fuzzy system engineering application.I have one in the fss, 12 months in the first instance, the opinion is very pertinent, very helpful.The second and third trials were all language problems, and they were 12 months before and after. In the end, I answered the results and ended up for 26 months.

(8) 讚！ | 匿名

The impact factor is very high. I have read the above articles and the quality is not good.

(5) 讚！ | 匿名