Sharing the general submission process for my FWB:
First review takes about 3 months, major revisions;
Second review takes 2 months, minor revisions;
Third review takes about half a month, minor revisions;
Return for revisions three times, accepting revisions for about half a month;
The main focus of the third revision is grammar polishing provided by the editors. Overall, this journal is very good, with professional opinions from the reviewers and editors, the only downside is that it's a bit slow

(0) 讚！ | lanqijun

Two revisions and three reviews, took 9 months and was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | FOR8GET

It is not necessary to provide supplements, but there must be convincing reasons for the reviewers and editors

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

All questions must be answered point by point, without omissions

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Reviewers and journal editors are asking me to supplement the experiment, do I have to supplement it, or is it mandatory?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

Should we also respond to the reviewers' good comments?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Let me share one of my experiences. Submitted at the end of October 2018, through major revision at the end of December, and minor revision during the second review at the end of January 2019. In April, the editor sent an email to accept the manuscript, and I just sent the final manuscript back today. Although the process was very difficult, I have to say that the journal editor and the reviewers’ comments are indeed in-depth! This is my first article with impact factor more than 3, and I hope there will be more articles in the future.

(5) 讚！ | youniwuhan

Sharing a bit of myself; submitted at the end of October 2018, major revisions at the end of December, minor revisions in late January 2019, and got an email from the editor in April saying they agreed to publish. Just sent back the final draft today. The process was tough, but I have to say the editor and reviewers of this journal provided very insightful feedback! My first article with a score of 3 or above, hoping for more in the future

(0) 讚！ | 香风寻山

Very good journal, with high peer recognition

(0) 讚！ | 迎丝姑娘

very good journal, peer recognition is higher

(0) 讚！ | 122

The top journal of freshwater ecology research, the international recognition is higher, the review period is slower, the expert opinion is very deep

(0) 讚！ | 234

Top journals in freshwater ecology research, high international recognition, slow review cycle, expertsThe opinion is very deep

(0) 讚！ | 234

One of the top journals in the field of freshwater ecology, highly recognized internationally, with a slow review process and expert opinions of great depth

(0) 讚！ | 北海婉琳

Top journal in the field of freshwater ecology, highly internationally recognized with a slow review process and expert opinions of great depth

(0) 讚！ | 晓易小公主

Journal homepage: http://http://onlinelibrary.wile ... 111/(ISSN)1365-2427

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Although the score is not high, it is indeed a good magazine, and the editors are quite serious and responsible, very careful when proofreading

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

A very good journal. My previous submit there often, and had an acceptance rate of 50%. The journal usually gave a reply in 8 weeks. The reviewer comments were in-depth, but in the end did not require us to write the paper to the most perfect state. However, it is still difficult to answer some questions.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名