Did the original poster submit the article for review later?

(0) 讚！ | Sicons

I have been with editor for 16 days

(0) 讚！ | Alen00

It has been 14 days with no news from the editor, and the date hasn't changed

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Still not submitted for review? It's been so long

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

5.28 submit
5.29 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Just follow the Aiswell official account

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Hello, I want to ask how did you know how many reviewers there were and even who the reviewers were? How did you get this information? I am very curious

(0) 讚！ | Accepted

4.26 submitted to journal
4.27 with editor
5.9 with editor

(0) 讚！ | BABAXU

Good luck, good luck

(1) 讚！ | 科研小小废柴

Generating PDF, please wait for a while

(0) 讚！ | xiaolianguai

Hello, I'd like to ask the teacher how to deal with the flashing of the "build pdf for approval" window?

(0) 讚！ | Sara

I would like to ask why the window flashes when submitting the manuscript, specifically at the "Build PDF for Approval" stage

(0) 讚！ | Sara

Was it sent for reevaluation after rework?

(0) 讚！ | GAO008

Share your submission experience this time, it was quite challenging. Two days after the decision was in process, the editor suggested resubmitting instead of direct rejection. The reason for the suggestion to resubmit was that it did not fit the scope of the journal. This reason certainly didn't convince me and my boss, as how could we submit to your journal if it didn't fit the scope. After my boss sent an appeal letter, the chief editor replied and sent it for review three days later. The long process of review then followed.

After 25 days, there was a major revision in the first review, with three reviewers, one rejecting it and two providing positive feedback.
After 10 days of revisions and resubmission, half a month later, the second review still required a major revision. The reviewer who initially rejected it provided specific comments in the second round, while the other two reviewers were not satisfied with some responses and requested further revisions.
Another 10 days for revisions, in the third review another major revision was required, with one reviewer suggesting acceptance and the other two raising additional questions.
After another 10 days of revisions, the fourth review finally accepted the submission. Not sure if the editor was worn out or if the reviewers had a change of heart, but it was really exhausting.

The review process completely depends on the speed of the reviewers. The editors of the journal were very efficient, as in each round of revisions, once feedback was received, they made a decision on the same day. Truly impressive speed

(0) 讚！ | 科研顺利-accept

The first review process is relatively fast, but it becomes very slow after major revisions are made. One of the original reviewers quickly completes the review, while the other one does not accept the manuscript and the editor does not push for progress. The status remains "under review" indefinitely. Is the second review process also going to be this slow now?

(0) 讚！ | gxddd19

The journal has a very fast processing speed, submitted on February 13, 2024, under review on February 15, and required reviews completed as of March 10

(0) 讚！ | 哆咪妈妈

1.22 STJ
1.23 with editor
1.25 under review (4 reviewers)
1.26 under review (1st reviewer accepted)
2.5 under review (4 reviewers accepted)
2.6 under review (1 reviewer accepted)
2.7 under review (1 reviewer accepted)
2.13 under review (review process completed)
2.26 rrc (review process completed)
3.5 reject
It took me so long, low efficiency

(0) 讚！ | cccccczzzzzzzz

Hello, I am also one of the two reviewers who accepted the invitation, but the second reviewer has not completed the review yet. Have you urged them? How long does this journal give reviewers to review? It has been more than two months and the review is not completed yet

(1) 讚！ | GAO008

2023.11.21 Submitted
2023.11.22 With editor
2023.11.27 Under review (Invited 12, 3 accepted)
2023.11.29 Under review (Invited 12, 5 accepted)
2023.12.07 Under review (Invited 12, 6 accepted)
2023.12.11 Under review (1 under review)
2023.12.16 Required reviews complete (1 review completed, 2nd review in progress)
2023.12.17 Required reviews complete (2 reviews completed, 3rd review in progress)
2023.12.18 Decision in process (4 reviews completed)
2023.12.20 Rejected

(0) 讚！ | 阿龙外传

Great

(0) 讚！ | 小巷

12.14 Submission
12.19 with editor
12.20 decision in process
Sigh~
I will argue with anyone who says the hydrogel is just "water". If it really was just "water", why wouldn't they even send it for review? Sigh, I'm so sad!!!

(10) 讚！ | 科研顺利-accept

On October 23, the status changed to "required review completed" after responses from two reviewers. On October 30, the status changed back to "under review." Not sure if the reviewers' comments were inconsistent or if there were not enough reviewers

(0) 讚！ | bless_lucky

9.17 under review
10.10 renovation
10.18 acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 小清新Zz

With editor for 18 days

(0) 讚！ | GAO008

Submitted on July 27
Editing process will begin around August 10 (approximately 20 days with editor)
Under review since August 10
During the under review period, the date keeps updating about every 2 weeks
It has been two months under review and the editor has contacted 16-18 reviewers, but only two experts have accepted to review and have not provided feedback yet. It can be foreseen that the submission process this time will be particularly lengthy

(1) 讚！ | bless_lucky