9.3 stj
9.17 with editor
9.21 under review
10.8 rrc
10.9 Major revision within 20 days deadline Two reviewers with a total of forty comments, all of which are positive comments
10.25 Return with editor
10.29 ur
11.12 RRC
11.13 Minor revision
11.17 Return
11.18 accept!
Overall quite smooth. Owen G Jones, the editor, was super efficient, both times returning the manuscript the day after RRC.

(0) 讚！ | www

The manuscript was reviewed by the editor approximately one month after submission, during which the formatting was revised once.

(0) 讚！ | cccc2022

I would like to ask everyone, is it required for all text parts to be in the body of the text in food chemistry now? Can only pictures be placed in the supplementary information?

(0) 讚！ | 高乐525

If there's no hurry, just wait; if there's a hurry, then push for the manuscript. With my personality, I would have definitely pushed for the manuscript after a month.

(0) 讚！ | 引路人

Hope all friends can provide their experiences.

(0) 讚！ | 阿克瑟普特

10.14 changed to "with editor"
10.17 "with editor" changed to a different time
It has been "with editor" all this time, is this normal? Will there be a chance for review?

(0) 讚！ | 阿克瑟普特

Last time I submitted (three months ago), the review process was very fast, with results given in just 7 days. This time, it has been 20 days and it is still "under review by the journal". I sent a follow-up email asking about the status, but the response was official and evasive. For those who are anxious to graduate, please be cautious when submitting to this journal. It's too, too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 引路人

Hello, may I ask if your article on food chemistry has been accepted for publication?

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡001

11.08 Editor's decisively powerful editing is accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 请叫我驼老师

Have you submitted for review now? How long with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 阿克瑟普特

The second review of RRC on November 5, 2024, but the public account shows that 3 reviewers were invited to edit. Only 2 accepted and completed the review, while one ran away. So not all RRCs are really RRCs. PS: There are 4 reviewers in the first review, dad.

(0) 讚！ | 请叫我驼老师

Congratulations, I am going to accept good luck, the second review of rrc on November 5, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | 请叫我驼老师

Is it a special edition?

(0) 讚！ | 学术卡拉米

accept 20241105

(1) 讚！ | 小飞猫

It has been 8 days since the second review, and I don't know why it's taking so long to get the results.

(0) 讚！ | 小飞猫

Don't panic, this magazine is known for its slow pace. If you want to speed up, you can try JAFC.

(0) 讚！ | 请叫我驼老师

May I ask if you have any results yet?

(0) 讚！ | cccc2022

It will take another month before it reaches the editor's desk, and it is currently being reviewed externally.

(0) 讚！ | cccc2022

Is there any great contributor who has recently submitted an article? Is it normal for it to be with the editor for almost 20 days? It has been over a month since submission, feeling anxious. The time in with editor has changed once, why is that?

(0) 讚！ | luckdog

After RRC, how long until the next step?

(0) 讚！ | yymca

Submission on May 18, 2024.
Major revision on August 31, with seven reviewers providing over 100 comments, requiring some challenging experiments to be added. 20 days were given for revisions.
Requested a 14-day extension for revisions on September 18, which was promptly approved by the editor.
Received back with editor on October 2.
Accepted on October 20.
Published online on October 21.
Received overwhelming feedback and suggestions from 12 reviewers, with 7 accepting the invitation. Over 100 comments were addressed, including about 10 that required additional experiments. The revision process was particularly challenging, and there were moments of doubt about resubmitting to the same journal. Ultimately, the decision was made to persevere and carefully address each comment. A two-week extension was requested from the editor, resulting in a final manuscript exceeding 10,000 words and nearly 50 pages of responses to the reviewers. The revised manuscript was submitted on time.
The editor's handling of the process was efficient, with acceptance received shortly thereafter without further review. Looking back, the experience was an emotional rollercoaster, but the thorough revisions left a positive impression on the editor. Grateful for the opportunity to make improvements.

(2) 讚！ | 天都仙女

The overall feeling is still pretty good.

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

My manuscript has been invited by 6 journals, but it has been almost a month and I have not received any feedback on the review.

(0) 讚！ | yymca

Not necessarily several, I have five, but if there are no rejections, it should be fewer.

(0) 讚！ | ACW

Can we exceed the word count requirement of the journal for articles that are sent back for revisions? Can the materials and methods section be placed in the supporting materials?

(0) 讚！ | ACW