Submitted in early September last year, officially accepted today. It's a done deal. After three rounds of revisions, it was no easy feat

(1) 讚！ | legendary

I have submitted several journals, but they were rejected because they did not meet the scope of the journal. But this time, I was rejected directly because of my English skills needed improvement. They asked me to revise and gave me a link for proofreading, saying that I could only enter the review stage after providing relevant proofreading certificates

(0) 讚！ | 再发论文啊

How long does it take to be submitted to the journal?

(0) 讚！ | 康帅

This journal is so slow, it has been almost a week since I submitted, it's really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 康帅

Oct 14, 2021 Submission;
Apr 24, 2022 Under Review;
The status "Under Review" has changed several times in between, and currently (2022.06.06) it is still in this state.
In agony...

(1) 讚！ | 逝年

Porous media Top 3, no refutation accepted! The other two are JoH and WRR. Although their impact factors are not very high, they are highly recognized in the industry. Anyone involved in environmental fluid or geological fluid research would typically reference articles from this journal. In recent years, there has been a focus on the coupled problems of fractured media, with a strong emphasis on numerical work. Several classic achievements have been published here.

I submitted an article, which was handled by the editor for nearly a month. The first review took 3-4 months. There were two reviewers, one with a positive response and the other with a skeptical attitude. The comments were sharp, and they easily spotted minor errors in the formulas, even suggesting referencing a paper from Physical Review. They also raised several fundamental questions, which were quite challenging.

After arduous revisions, I wrote a 13-page response letter. After submitting the major revisions, it took about 1 month for re-review. The editor finally confirmed the acceptance, and it was a success. The whole process took approximately 5-6 months and was not easy. I am grateful to myself and thankful to the editor!

(72) 讚！ | IamAReader

The first review took about 1 and a half months, and received comprehensive feedback from the editor-in-chief, with nearly 40 suggestions covering methodology, content, and grammar. When making revisions, it is necessary to respond to each suggestion patiently.

The second review was delayed by three months due to system issues (so it should have normally taken about 5 months). It required minor revisions, but the feedback remained targeted.

The third review only required minor revisions and was accepted within three to four days after submission.

The journal is excellent and a top publication in the field of water resources. The content review is meticulous, and there is a high demand for innovation.

(11) 讚！ | Dudupup

Although the impact factor is slightly low and the number of articles published is very few, it can still be considered a decent journal.

(1) 讚！ | Geo-oeG

Painful experience, the review process is too strict, every annotation in the figure is examined very carefully, there are sixty to seventy comments in the first review, and it is very difficult to make changes. The requirement for innovation is extremely high, and the review period is long. It is not recommended to submit an article if one is not fully confident in it. Currently, the requirements are similar to AGU's WRR, JGR, and the proportion of Chinese publications is relatively small.

(67) 讚！ | 876557889dd

The journal in the field of hydrology and WRR are equally important. The articles in the journal are highly theoretical, making it difficult to get published. The emphasis is on fluid-related articles, with a minimum requirement of being in the top tier (Zone 1). Being classified in the second tier (Zone 2) is considered humorous.

(110) 讚！ | ysalc

Expected annual submissions over 1200, with a publication quantity of 200. The preference is for solid and detailed papers without gimmicks, focusing on algorithms or model-related topics.

(25) 讚！ | 科研007

The first review time took three months. There were two reviewers, and one minor revision and one major revision were required. Two months was given for revision, and the revision was re-reviewed in one month and then accepted.

(4) 讚！ | 七月过半

I have submitted two articles here consecutively. The first article was reviewed for more than two months and was accepted after major revision. The second one was rejected within two months. The speed is considered fast in the Elsevier journal. The reviewer must be a real expert in the industry, and hit the nail on the head. I have learned a lot from the review comments. The rejected articles are submitted to other journals and got direct acceptance after revision according to the reviewers' comments.

(3) 讚！ | leon08

It took 1 month from submission to review, but still under review after 2 months. There was no response ever. We can get out of it as soon as possible if it was rejected earlier. Would you please give us a reply as soon as possible? It is really a torture. We checked it every day, but it remained the same status. It has been three months. . .

(2) 讚！ | tanlc

This should be a district, the Chinese Academy of Sciences can not understand ah

(22) 讚！ | Lastcavas

This is a top journal in the field of multiphase flow and transmission in porous media. Most of the reviewers are established scientists in this field and provide critical reviews with many revisions. From what I understand, this journal prefers papers on numerical and computational simulation research.

(15) 讚！ | 石油

The top journals in the field of multiphase flow and transmission in porous media, reviewers are big cattle in the field, critical review, innovative requirementshigh.The journal attaches great importance to papers on numerical and computational simulation directions.

(19) 讚！ | 石油

Floating class top journal, it is difficult to send a valuable journal at the same time

(43) 讚！ | 清华园

The influence factor has soared in recent years, two reviewers, overhauled twice, and finally received

(0) 讚！ | shr

The influence factor has soared in recent years, two reviewers, overhauled twice, and finally received

(1) 讚！ | shr

is a hard-to-send journal that is similar to WRR.

(12) 讚！ | Anonymous

is a hard-to-send journal that is similar to WRR.

(16) 讚！ | Anonymous

Attitude is very important, and the details are the key..It is also very important to recommend reviewers. After careful consideration, you should select the appropriate recommended reviewer

(0) 讚！ | Wyy

usually invites four reviewers.The speed is OK, three months.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/advances-in-water-resources/

(0) 讚！ | 匿名