Submitted to Journal on 2024.03.29

(0) 讚！ | 蠢小葱

Waited for 5 months to say that they couldn't find reviewers, then directly rejected the submission... Serious delay for graduation

(0) 讚！ | 小西红柿

FCT has fallen to Zone 3, it's unbelievable

(4) 讚！ | 吴茱萸

It's down to the third district. Ah, it has become a journal. How did it end up with a new editor?

(0) 讚！ | 松滋

Just submitted in December and it already dropped to Zone 3

(0) 讚！ | 无奈的小橙子

Just like you, and also looking for a job

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦-1234

I can't believe it has changed to Zone 3. I started voting for Zone 1, I really didn't expect this

(4) 讚！ | 左海刻苦的蚕豆

Overall, it's quite good and very friendly

(0) 讚！ | 小邱呀

9.16 was repaired again, and each time only 1-2 new issues were raised. However, each repair takes 10 days to receive a response. The editor is about to suffocate from frustration

(0) 讚！ | scottlee

2023.1.6: Submission
with editor Forgotten how long, probably 2-4 weeks
2023.6.2: Major revision
2023.6.18: Supplementary experiments, resubmission
2023.7.15: Revision, second reviewer raised new issues
2023.7.19: Resubmission
2023.8.20: Minor revision, resubmitted the same day. Reviewer had no further comments, editor raised 2 minor issues. One was to increase the font size in the figure, the other was to explain the meaning of a figure caption.
2023.8.30: Minor revision. Editor requested further polishing
2023.9.6: Resubmission
2023.9.12: Still with editor;
The journal is toxicology top-notch, the editor is Bryan Delaney. Probably won't choose it next time, hahaha

(0) 讚！ | scottlee

Two reviewers' comments, revised and under review (one reviewer), after half a month with editor, under review again on the same day (another reviewer). Does anyone know what this means?

(0) 讚！ | 吴茱萸

May I ask how much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 苏桃

4.19 Submission
5.28 First-round revision
6.6 Second-round revision
6.9 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 白发阿叔

The most interesting thing is that the first author is an international doctoral student whose native language is English (from Zimbabwe). Therefore, I didn't make major changes to the initial draft as long as it was understandable. I thought the language was a bit verbose, but I didn't make significant changes to the wording. However, during the first round of review, an expert pointed out hundreds of grammar, typing, and fluency errors, suggesting that we seek professional translation services to improve the language. Our team, relying on my writing skills in English, which I believe are not inferior to native speakers, has never sought professional English editing before, and this time was no exception. After revising our scientific questions and responses, I critically reviewed the entire text with a strict spirit, and some paragraphs were completely transformed. After the revisions, the second-round expert said there was a significant improvement, and the editor did not mention any language issues again.

(0) 讚！ | 白发阿叔

The chief editor personally handled it and also sought assistance from a deputy chief editor from China. It feels friendly and impartial.

(0) 讚！ | 白发阿叔

Please modify the submission date to February 13th and the acceptance date to June 1st.

(0) 讚！ | 黄绍

Why has my submission been "with editor" for a month?

(0) 讚！ | 361du

The translation of the text into English is as follows: 

Initially, it started with editing for revision, and then submitted to the editor for review. After three days, it went into the "under review" stage. However, after 1.5 months, it was directly rejected. I didn't understand why the experts' feedback only suggested minor revisions. Then, the editor recommended a toxicology-related journal that was not an SCI (Science Citation Index) journal. After rejecting the transfer, it was directly rejected. If it didn't meet the criteria from the beginning, why bother with peer review?

(1) 讚！ | 风格二

3 weeks since submission, currently under review, hoping for good luck!

(2) 讚！ | licongxin

Direct hire, amazing!

(0) 讚！ | chq

Posted on November 9th of the 22nd year, reviewed by the editor around November 11th or 12th, under review within a week, received major revisions comments on December 4th, revised and resubmitted on the 21st, accepted on the 27th. The editor and reviewers were very efficient, providing valuable suggestions. This journal is highly recommended.

(0) 讚！ | chq

The editors and reviewers were very efficient, and the first review was completed within two weeks. The reviewers were very professional and raised many questions, which greatly helped improve the quality of the manuscript.

(2) 讚！ | 黄豆芽

A good journal with fast review speed. It is a bit low-key as a top toxicology journal. Hopefully, the impact factor can be improved this year.

(6) 讚！ | 左海刻苦的蚕豆

After waiting for the first review for about four weeks, we got the result with only requiring a polishing, and no other requirements. I submitted it after language editing, and four weeks later, it was accepted directly. It was very lucky.

(3) 讚！ | Perkin

6.27, submitted to journal; 7.3, with editor; 7.3, under review; 9.19, decision in process; 9.20, revised major revision; 10.19, submitted to journal; 10.21, under review; 10.22, decision in process; 10.23, accept. The reviewers and editor are very professional, serious and careful.

(4) 讚！ | 松滋