9.8 submission
9.17 review
9.26 major revision
10.8 second review
10.18 acceptance
The review process was very fast, with two new reviewers invited for the second review, and the time from submission to acceptance was just over a month.

(0) 讚！ | 2000s

Why is it that after the revision, it shows finding the most suitable editor, shouldn't it still be the original editor?

(0) 讚！ | 爱做梦的二狗

It has been only a month and a half since the acceptance, and it has been accepted for half a month. How long will it take to revise?

(0) 讚！ | M马斯特

Does this magazine have page fees? Can I choose not to use OA and not have to pay?

(0) 讚！ | pangyun

The results will be back within a week

(0) 讚！ | 拟南芥

Is this journal submission now done through Springer's new system?

(0) 讚！ | kkkk2

How long did it take for you to receive it after returning for repairs?

(0) 讚！ | 小黄鸭

Submission received 03 Jul 2023
Submission under peer review 04 Jul 2023
Revision received 29 Oct 2023
Submission accepted 30 Oct 2023

(0) 讚！ | 拟南芥

The response time of this journal is good. However, the self-citation rate is a bit high, it has reached 20%, so be careful not to get a warning

(2) 讚！ | 顾的白

Hello, I would like to ask if this status is "with editor" for the revision that I just submitted.

(0) 讚！ | accept 拜托了

Submitted to acceptance takes about three months. The editing process is very fast, while the review stage is slightly slower. Thank you for the recognition from the editor and reviewers.

(7) 讚！ | 黄豆芽

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 黄豆芽

May I ask what does "Under Revision" mean? Does it refer to the status of the manuscript being reviewed or does it mean that the author needs to provide additional materials? After submitting my manuscript, the editor asked me to provide additional information, but I haven't received any emails since then. However, when I logged into the system, it says there is a status awaiting my response. I don't understand what I am supposed to respond to.

(0) 讚！ | VIKI77

May I ask how did you resubmit it? Did you send an email?

(0) 讚！ | jiangc

Hello, may I ask how to resubmit this? I also submitted it before to request reference comparison with journal literature. After making the changes, I couldn't find where to resubmit. Do I need to send an email to resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | jiangc

Due to the lack of word limit in this journal and its preference for similar research directions, I submitted my manuscript in the past, which required me to compare it with the literature in this journal's field (basically asking me to cite their publications more). After a month and a half, I received major revisions, and after revising and resubmitting within a week or so, it was accepted for publication. Overall, the process was relatively fast.

(3) 讚！ | 毕业顺利

Excuse me, I also received a rejection here, with the reason being the lack of referencing. How did you submit yours? I am planning to resubmit mine, but they said I cannot resubmit and need to wait for the article to be transferred.

(0) 讚！ | 夜雨秋灯话鬼狐

2017.11.7, submitted
2018.1.30, major revision
2018.2.7, revised
2018.3.13, accepted

(0) 讚！ | 先生的科学

My manuscript involves the research of using machine vision for the identification and classification of fruits and vegetables. When I first submitted the manuscript, the editor directly returned it and asked for a clarification of the innovative points of the manuscript compared to similar articles previously published in this journal. I think the main issue was that the references did not include the journal's references, so I added the journal's references and made comparisons to clarify the innovative aspects of this study. The resubmission was successful and sent for review.

October 21, 2020: Submitted
January 16, 2021: Major revisions and reconsideration. Two reviewers provided positive feedback, while one suggested rejection. The editor requested major revisions.
February 1, 2021: Submitted revised version
April 13, 2021: Minor revisions for acceptance. After the second round of revisions, two additional reviewers were added. The reviewer with positive feedback from the first revision stated that the modifications did not meet their requirements and suggested rejection. However, the opinions of the two new reviewers were positive. The editor accepted the manuscript after minor revisions.
April 14, 2021: Submitted revised version
April 19, 2021: Accepted

(2) 讚！ | 酒酒无憾

It is not recommended to submit to this journal. It was sent for review for four times. There were 5 reviewers in total, four of them required minor revision, and the other one required major revision. The revised article was submitted after the revisions were all made. It was sent for review again. It has been 5 months after being sent for review, but it is still under review.

(3) 讚！ | 傲娇的骚包

I don’t like this journal. It’s obviously there are many similar articles published in this journal, but surprisedly the editor rejected the manuscript for the research is not suitable. I have submitted articles twice, and never got a chance to be sent for review. One of them was submitted to a better journal and got accepted. Ha ha!

(2) 讚！ | xuezha-yangzai

The journal has great potential for appreciation. There are good articles to post on it

(3) 讚！ | jay

1 Submitted on the 27th of the month, received on April 27th, the middle of the review because of missing a reviewer's opinion, the speed is faster

(0) 讚！ | guochaofanfan@outlook.com

Editor-in-Chief: Sun Dawen, never submitted a Chinese paper.From the existing published papers containing Chinese names, it can be seen that they are communication, not counting the impact factor calculation.The impact factor is low.The proposal is turned into the second district.

(10) 讚！ | Yang

this journal is also absolutely, waited for a month, sent a reviewIf you don’t have it at all, you will refuse it. It’s inexplicable and you won’t select for it again!

(2) 讚！ | mimi