A benchmark journal in the field of agriculture and forestry must have field observation data for two years or more. Leading experts in the field have published articles in this journal, ranging from high-level to seemingly average.

Last December, I submitted a paper, which was initially rejected for revisions (requiring the separation of results and discussion sections). After making the necessary changes, I resubmitted it. About two months later, I received the reviewers' comments for major revisions. Due to delays in writing the funding section, it took over a month to make the required changes. After resubmitting, it took about a month for both reviewers to return their comments, and eventually, it was accepted one week later by the editor.

Overall, this journal has relatively good reviews, with reviewers paying attention to whether the research approaches the issues from a new perspective. This experience has taught me the publishing norms (focus points) of reputable journals and has been very rewarding

(1) 讚！ | spacr2020

Can I ask if the submission at the end of March was rejected at the end of April for revisions before resubmission? One reviewer's opinion was acceptance and another was revisions before resubmission, but the editor requested revisions before resubmission. Should I resubmit to these two reviewers or just the first one? Is there still a chance for acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | WJysan5009

2024.1.2 Major revision
2024.3.2 Revised
2024.3.13 Major revision, it should be a mistake made by the editor, no comments, give another two months
2024.4.28 Revised
2024.5.13 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

The college student went back to his hometown for summer vacation

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

An old and high-quality journal in the field of agriculture and forestry science, with strict requirements and good reputation in the industry. Submissions must be based on field studies of non-economic crops lasting over one year. The review process may be slightly slow.
Submission: July 19, 2023
Revision: October 5
Revised Submission: October 21
Second Revision: January 3, 2024
Revised Submission: January 7
Acceptance: January 9

(1) 讚！ | 神迹

Why was your application rejected and asked to resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | China

How far along are we now? How much progress have we made?

(0) 讚！ | China

Why was the submission rejected for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | China

The process was a bit rough, with two rejections and resubmissions, which is equivalent to submitting three times. It was because it was a good journal that I did not give up and was finally accepted. Perhaps the editor also admired my persistence

(1) 讚！ | WYX-SHZU

2023.10.5 Submission
2023.10.6 with editor
2023.10.9 Under Review
2023.10.23 One reviewer has revised, another is revising

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

23-8-18 submitted
23-8-20 with editor
23-8-24 under review
This is the third submission, probably will have news by the end of September
Update
23-10-16 minor revisions
23-10-21 minor revisions returned
23-10-31 accepted
It is probably the smoothest one among all the articles, unimaginably fast. Had to remind the editor when it was under review for 50 days.
The third field, probably the last one. Very grateful to the reviewers and editors

(1) 讚！ | 寒天晨晨

2.28 Submission,
4.17 Rejection, editor gave me a chance to resubmit.
5.8 Resubmission,
5.19 External review,
7.15 Major revision,
7.24 Minor revision,
8.13 Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 晚风恰好温柔

What a procrastinator! The assistant editor in charge of the first review has dragged it out for a month, and now it's been another half a month for the deputy chief editor's feedback on the second review.

(3) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

2022.11.10 submit
2022.11.16 resubmit
2023.3.24 minor revision
2023.4.8 submit
2023.6.25 acceptable
2023.6.28 submit
2023.6.30 accept
After the minor revision, I waited for two months before receiving any news. The reviewer had no objections, and the editor was very responsible and made corrections to the entire manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | Gene+Model+Wheat

Wrong, America's.

(0) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

Mine is John Snider from Italy, who is yours?

(0) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

Too slow, in a hurry to graduate, need to be cautious. After minor revisions with the editor, it takes one month. After being under review, it takes another month.

(0) 讚！ | omgbobo

23.03.19 Submit
23.05.08 Minor revision
23.05.13 Resubmit, with editor
23.05.15 with editor
23.06.12 minor revision
23.06.16 Resubmitted
23.07.07 Required reviews completed
23.07.15 Accepted

Translation:
23.03.19 Submit
23.05.08 Minor revision
23.05.13 Resubmit, with editor
23.05.15 with editor
23.06.12 minor revision
23.06.16 Resubmitted
23.07.07 Required reviews completed
23.07.15 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

How long after sending it will it be sent out by the editor?

(0) 讚！ | Gene+Model+Wheat

It used to be quite fast, but now I don't know what happened.

(0) 讚！ | soo superior

2023.04.19 under review. Damn it, is there no one willing to review it?

(0) 讚！ | soo superior

This journal is so slow. The minor revision has been sent back for 10 days and it is still "with editor".

(0) 讚！ | Gene+Model+Wheat

Indeed slow, but your slowness is outrageous.

(0) 讚！ | soo superior

2023.04.15 under review. I'm going crazy, why is it so slow?

(0) 讚！ | soo superior

Hello, may I ask how long it usually takes for the return repair with the editor? Is it accepted or sent for review again?

(0) 讚！ | Gene+Model+Wheat