What is the status now? It has been two months since I submitted it to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | lghqq

The review process is quite slow. The paper was submitted on October 23, 2023, and accepted on September 29, 2024. After being rejected twice, the editors still allowed resubmission. The journal review is strict and professional, so for those anxious about graduation, please carefully consider before submitting again. Good luck to everyone, may your first submission be successful.

(0) 讚！ | 学长-YLU

The third field crop was accepted.
Submission on April 1st
There were two revisions in between, the first revision was rejected by the original reviewer, then a new reviewer was found, and after the second round of revisions with four questions, it was accepted directly after 25 days without being sent back to the reviewer.
Accepted on September 31st
After acceptance, there are several papers in hand, and only three are top journals in the field of crop cultivation. It is not easy to find a good job (with high pay) in this field. Hahaha, I don't know what I'm getting myself into, just smiling bitterly.

(0) 讚！ | 小小小小小林

I urged them and got it back in around 50 days, just fixed it today.

(0) 讚！ | 爱科研的小刘

After about 50 days in the system, send an email to the editor to inquire about the recent status of the manuscript as it has been a while.

(0) 讚！ | 寒天晨晨

Hello, do you have any effective ways to urge submissions?

(0) 讚！ | 学长-YLU

How should we follow up with this journal for our submission?

(0) 讚！ | 爱科研的小刘

Did you send the reminder for the manuscript to the editor-in-chief? Or did you send it to someone else?

(0) 讚！ | 爱科研的小刘

A benchmark journal in the field of agriculture and forestry must have field observation data for two years or more. Leading experts in the field have published articles in this journal, ranging from high-level to seemingly average.

Last December, I submitted a paper, which was initially rejected for revisions (requiring the separation of results and discussion sections). After making the necessary changes, I resubmitted it. About two months later, I received the reviewers' comments for major revisions. Due to delays in writing the funding section, it took over a month to make the required changes. After resubmitting, it took about a month for both reviewers to return their comments, and eventually, it was accepted one week later by the editor.

Overall, this journal has relatively good reviews, with reviewers paying attention to whether the research approaches the issues from a new perspective. This experience has taught me the publishing norms (focus points) of reputable journals and has been very rewarding

(1) 讚！ | spacr2020

Can I ask if the submission at the end of March was rejected at the end of April for revisions before resubmission? One reviewer's opinion was acceptance and another was revisions before resubmission, but the editor requested revisions before resubmission. Should I resubmit to these two reviewers or just the first one? Is there still a chance for acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | WJysan5009

2024.1.2 Major revision
2024.3.2 Revised
2024.3.13 Major revision, it should be a mistake made by the editor, no comments, give another two months
2024.4.28 Revised
2024.5.13 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

The college student went back to his hometown for summer vacation

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

An old and high-quality journal in the field of agriculture and forestry science, with strict requirements and good reputation in the industry. Submissions must be based on field studies of non-economic crops lasting over one year. The review process may be slightly slow.
Submission: July 19, 2023
Revision: October 5
Revised Submission: October 21
Second Revision: January 3, 2024
Revised Submission: January 7
Acceptance: January 9

(1) 讚！ | 神迹

Why was your application rejected and asked to resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | China

How far along are we now? How much progress have we made?

(0) 讚！ | China

Why was the submission rejected for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | China

The process was a bit rough, with two rejections and resubmissions, which is equivalent to submitting three times. It was because it was a good journal that I did not give up and was finally accepted. Perhaps the editor also admired my persistence

(1) 讚！ | WYX-SHZU

2023.10.5 Submission
2023.10.6 with editor
2023.10.9 Under Review
2023.10.23 One reviewer has revised, another is revising

(0) 讚！ | hereandnow

23-8-18 submitted
23-8-20 with editor
23-8-24 under review
This is the third submission, probably will have news by the end of September
Update
23-10-16 minor revisions
23-10-21 minor revisions returned
23-10-31 accepted
It is probably the smoothest one among all the articles, unimaginably fast. Had to remind the editor when it was under review for 50 days.
The third field, probably the last one. Very grateful to the reviewers and editors

(1) 讚！ | 寒天晨晨

2.28 Submission,
4.17 Rejection, editor gave me a chance to resubmit.
5.8 Resubmission,
5.19 External review,
7.15 Major revision,
7.24 Minor revision,
8.13 Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 晚风恰好温柔

What a procrastinator! The assistant editor in charge of the first review has dragged it out for a month, and now it's been another half a month for the deputy chief editor's feedback on the second review.

(3) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

2022.11.10 submit
2022.11.16 resubmit
2023.3.24 minor revision
2023.4.8 submit
2023.6.25 acceptable
2023.6.28 submit
2023.6.30 accept
After the minor revision, I waited for two months before receiving any news. The reviewer had no objections, and the editor was very responsible and made corrections to the entire manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | Gene+Model+Wheat

Wrong, America's.

(0) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

Mine is John Snider from Italy, who is yours?

(0) 讚！ | 不要拉我，我还能写

Too slow, in a hurry to graduate, need to be cautious. After minor revisions with the editor, it takes one month. After being under review, it takes another month.

(0) 讚！ | omgbobo