Yes, it's free for both readers and authors

(0) 讚！ | 蟹苑头头

Hello, may I ask if this journal is completely free, meaning it is open-source but does not charge any fees?

(0) 讚！ | younger！

It is still relatively good.

(0) 讚！ | 蟹苑头头

The first article I submitted during my doctoral studies was in the field of polymer physics. The editing process was very efficient, with a total of 4 reviewers who were all very diligent and responsible. Among them, 2 gave high evaluations. Recently, the impact factor has reached 4.17, which is quite impressive. The time to publication is also very reasonable. Let's all strive for it!

(0) 讚！ | 饼夹菜

I had submitted an article before, which was submitted the first day and rejected the next day. Then I transferred it to Polymers, the review lasted one month, and it was accepted after a major revision was made. The second article was submitted a few days ago and was rejected the next day. The acceptance rate is very low and I will never submit manuscripts to this journal again.

(4) 讚！ | 慎独

After the major revision was submitted, it has been 7 days. When will there be a result? I pray for acceptance!

(0) 讚！ | qin

The review speed was pretty fast and no delay. In 2017, I read the article once and thought it was of high quality, so I submitted the article of polymer hydrogel adsorption material. There was only one status for the submission. If the status is unchanged for one month, it will be sent for review, and the results will be returned within one month. Rejection will be notified directly within 3 days. There’s minor revision needed in the first submission, but it was accepted after the revision.

(151) 讚！ | deechue

Reviewing speed is very fast, the recruitment rate is a bit low

(1) 讚！ | 123

This journal influence factor 2.29 The future can punch 3 journals, have potential. Speed ​​and efficiency improve the influence of the model

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Editing rights are great!It is half the success of the trial.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

One month's review comments, a total of five reviewers, four gave high praise, one according to, but this reviewer did not give advice, said tooLong no new ideas are not suitable for publication, it is estimated that there is no reading at all, editing the draft, and casually wrote two fools.According to the news given by their editor, the draft rate is now more than 80%, but the editor likes your manuscript will give you a review, according to the reviewer's language level (see if it is native native speakers), edit andNot all of our reviewers are recommended.In addition, according to the time, although the editor gave a major overhaul (the actual reviewers are minor revision opinions), after submitting the revised manuscript, it is estimated that there is no trial.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2012The impact factor will rise to 2.2-2.3

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The draft rate is already 80%

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

1 Submission CompletedDate of submission:2012-05-12

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The six reviewers gave comments, including two rejection comments, three overhaul comments, and one minor revision.The battle is huge.The speed is absolutely fast!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is now a large amount of manuscripts, and there are fewer publications. In the first issue, only 8-9 articles were issued, which is difficult to select.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal was founded in 2007, and was included in SCI in 2008. In 2009, it had an impact factor of 1.452. The journal publishes papers on new materials, new theories, and new findings. All three papers I submitted were accepted after major revision. Some other people in our lab also submitted to this journal, but they all got rejected without peer review. I think the paper must have something very new. If there is no novelty, the editor will reject the manuscript; if you pass the editorial assessment, then you have a 90% possibility to have the paper accepted, so the editor has the power to determine the fate of the paper. Usually 4 reviewers or more. All my three papers had 4 reviewers, all requested minor revisions.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted on July 7 this year, there are five reviewers.People, to the review comments given in mid-August, one of the rejected comments, the overall opinion is overhaul, returned after two weeks, waited for two weeks, received on September 12, officially published on December 6.Overall, the speed is still very fast and will not be yours. If your content does not meet the requirements of him, or if the novelty is not enough, it may be rejected on the same day and will not delay the time.Anyone who edits is better. The letter will be returned soon. The attitude is very good. If you think your article is more in line with this grade, you can still consider it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Manuscript adoption rate is 30%.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名