It is not necessary to provide supporting evidence, but it is essential to have convincing reasons for the judges and editors

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Issues related to experiments and article writing

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What questions do reviewers and journal editors typically ask?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Do peer reviewers and journal editors require me to do additional experiments? Is it absolutely necessary to do them?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: The chief editor specially invited, and the theme was given by the chief editor (which can be appropriately changed) The review speed is about two months, with two reviewers. The first reviewer was very positive when submitting the initial draft, with no major issues; the second reviewer raised many sharp questions. Based on the feedback, the chief editor gave a "reject, but can resubmit after changes" decision, stating that a re-submission would require another round of review. We made modifications and wrote a lengthy response (over 4,000 words, mainly due to the numerous comments from the second reviewer). The chief editor was satisfied and accepted the paper in less than a week (seemingly without another review). Overall, the chief editor was very professional and the review speed was good. As it was a special invitation from the chief editor, the theme had already been decided, but it should be relatively easier to avoid rejection (as long as changes are made to their satisfaction

(0) 讚！ | 一只单阏呀

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0 Experience Sharing: This journal in the field of proteomics is very good, usually by invitation, but you can also ask the editor if the content is suitable for this journal. The review process takes about two months, and although it is not open access, it is widely cited. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 书生乐荷

Being invited as the main editor for a review article is a great honor

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Bullish, will it rise again next year?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁