How long does the review process take for this?

(0) 讚！ | 凯利布鲁克

How long does the review process usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 凯利布鲁克

Is this magazine accepting submissions via company email?

(0) 讚！ | 北风德润

Thank you so much!

(0) 讚！ | 东海泽睿

There is no need to provide information about the antibody manufacturer, etc., according to his submission requirements. The manufacturer of the antibody specificity should be written in the instructions

(0) 讚！ | 深渊彤彤

Do I need to validate the specificity of each antibody for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 东海泽睿

Yes

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The corresponding author of a SCI journal paper doesn't necessarily have to be only one person, and there is no fixed standard for how many there can be. This is because different SCI journals have different policies regarding the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only recognize one corresponding author, if a paper has multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author will automatically be selected as the corresponding author. For SCI journals that recognize two corresponding authors, two corresponding authors can be listed. The same applies to other requirements. In other words, the number of corresponding authors listed by the authors must comply with the regulations of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the most contributions to the experiment and the writing of the paper, and is the person whose name appears first in the list of authors. However, in collaborative work, it is common to have multiple first authors. There is no clear rule regarding the number of co-first authors, which depends greatly on the amount of work, the length of the paper, the regulations of the publishing journal, and the recognition of the institution. Generally, having 2-4 first authors for an SCI paper is most common

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Will all authors receive an email after the article has been accepted?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

How many corresponding authors/first authors can a journal have?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Do you want a layout fee? 
zzwannaone 2017-06-22 00:00:00 posted: I think this magazine is able to accept articles related to cardiovascular muscle physiology, pathology, and neurology. The first review was completed in less than a month, and the questions raised by the two reviewers were very pertinent. The editor's main focus is on ethics, and the methods section must be clearly written with relevant content. Additionally, the magazine requires all Western blot images for analysis. I consolidated all my results into one image and sent it over. I received feedback in just 4 days, with the editor raising a few minor questions. After replying, my article was accepted in another 4 days. The magazine is very fast, and the editor is very thorough, noticing many small issues in my previous articles. Personally, I feel that everything went very smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 是你的和洽呀

Do you need a layout fee?                                                                                                                                         
Franksix 2017-11-26 12:30:00 posted: There are not many people paying attention to this magazine, right? Is it because physiology is a niche field? I hope the magazine will gradually improve, I am currently submitting an article, in the process of revision, I hope for a good result

(0) 讚！ | 活人雨萱

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Sharing Experience: Not many people seem to pay attention to this journal, is it because it's about physiology, which is not popular? I hope that the journal will improve over time. I am currently submitting an article, waiting for revisions, and hoping for a positive outcome

(0) 讚！ | 玉女淑贞

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: I think this journal is suitable for submissions on cardiovascular muscle physiology, pathology, and neurology. The first review took less than a month, with very relevant questions raised by two reviewers. The editor pays attention to ethics, so the methods section must be clearly written. Additionally, the journal requires all western blot images for analysis, so I compiled all my results into one image and sent it over. I received feedback after 4 days, with a few minor issues raised by the editor. After responding, my paper was accepted within another 4 days. The journal is fast-paced, and the editor is meticulous, identifying many small issues in my previous work. Personally, I feel the process went very smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 金山雨雁

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed was very fast, and I was rejected after 3 days, with the reason given as lack of innovation!!

(0) 讚！ | 冬马元灵

Submitted on the day under review, rejected after 10 days. Two editors provided many opinions, pointed out the issues directly, suitable for submission in the field of electrophysiology. Will continue to submit to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 深渊晟睿

Submitted 10 days ago, the submission was under review on the same day. Two days ago, the under review status suddenly changed to 0 submissions, but the status in the submit history is still under review. I have emailed the editor to ask if I need to resubmit, and I am waiting for a response

(0) 讚！ | 深渊晟睿

So stable, just strengthen a little bit, isn't it just breaking three points? It's really difficult

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The review process is extremely fast, and acceptance was received two days after revision. In total, it took three weeks. The review is quite meticulous. This journal is considered to be of a relatively high level in pathology and physiology. Spamming is prohibited

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁