Submitted in April, received feedback in September from two experts with more than 50 comments. Major revisions were made and resubmitted in November. One month later, reviews were completed. This process continued for 2 months before the decision was given by the editor after an email inquiry. Minor revisions were made and accepted two days after resubmission. The journal is highly respected and the editor is very interested in the research work, although the process was a bit slow

(0) 讚！ | 土木的木

Submitted in July, received initial review results two months later with two reviewers and over 30 questions, requiring major revisions. After submitting the revised manuscript, it took one month to receive feedback, still requiring major revisions but with only four remaining questions, including the editor's comments. Accepted one week after the final modifications were made. Published online approximately one week later. The reviewers were very responsible and professional, and the editor was also good.

(0) 讚！ | 分享者-1973

Hello, may I ask what the final result is? It has been half a month since I completed the reviews as well.

(0) 讚！ | xiaofei213

Hello, I would like to ask if you have experienced the status of "reviews completed" and how long it usually takes. I have been in this status for half a month and I'm not sure what the situation is.

(0) 讚！ | 拽拽人儿

The review time is more than 6 months, but the speed is pleasantly surprising. Although the impact factor is slightly lower, the manuscript review process is very professional. The editor is very interested in the article's topic and the advice given is also very fair. Let's learn and improve together. Don't be confused when submitting.

(31) 讚！ | 教书育人

This is a journal of the International Society of Experimental Mechanics. An authoritive and professional Journal. The length of the article is generally not very long, but the quality of the journal is very high. The review cycle seems to be three months and some, but BRIEF NOTES might be reviewed faster. In 2010, when the journal was ranked Q3, I submitted a paper, which was on a specialized topic. On the second day, the editor rejected the manuscript. That was on Christmas Eve, which tells me how hard the editor worked. Based on my personal submission experience, it is recommended to submit papers on fundamental experiments or a commonly interested topic, which would have a broad audience.

(4) 讚！ | 匿名