My situation is similar to yours. One reviewer accepted it directly, while another requested major revisions. After completing the revisions, the editor invited the reviewer again. I saw the reviewer's comments in September, but there has been no result so far. I am also hesitant to follow up.

(0) 讚！ | daria

Submission received
09 Sep 2024
Technical check
Submission is under technical check
09 Sep 2024
Amendment requested
16 Sep 2024
Amendment received
16 Sep 2024
Submission passed technical check
17 Sep 2024
Editorial assignment
Submission status Date
Ready for editorial assignment
17 Sep 2024
With editor
Editor assigned
19 Sep 2024
Peer review
Submission status Date
First reviewer(s) invited
26 Sep 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted
20 Oct 2024
Reviewer report(s) received
27 Oct 2024

Close to two months, hoping for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | wfegfg

Minor revisions accepted, reviewers' comments are constructive, and the efficiency is acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | wbwbwbwb

After one month of technical review and acceptance by two reviewers, with one set of comments already received, the submission was still withdrawn by the assistant editor due to the extended timeframe. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | TangMY

In May, I submitted a review article, which was sent for review by the editor one month later. After one review, we received comments from four reviewers (one reviewer dropped out halfway, taking a total of 2 months). The article required major revisions and we were given 10 days to make the revisions. After the reviewers returned their comments, the editor accepted the article without further revisions. The entire process took approximately 3 months.

(1) 讚！ | 陈仕

The randomness is too strong.

(0) 讚！ | Ning

You are so lucky. Last September, you submitted an article, and it went through a long initial review and editing process. You had to send reminders in the middle, and it took several days to receive a reply. It took about a month to invite reviewers, and the first wave of invitations did not work out. After another month, the second wave of invitations was sent out, and then the article was left unattended. It wasn't until February of this year when the journal sent a message saying that the article had to be withdrawn because they couldn't find reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | fan@1225

Pretty fast, I didn't expect that the invited reviewers could provide revisions in just one day.

(0) 讚！ | Ning

Family members, who understands? The pace is too slow

(1) 讚！ | qqq132123

Submitted on 4th September, 2013, received first reviewer's comments on 3rd November, and then heard nothing back. During this time, sent reminder emails but received no replies. Sent another reminder email on 5th February, 2024, and on 6th February, the editor replied that they hadn't received feedback from the other reviewer, so they decided to withdraw the submission. It's really frustrating

(0) 讚！ | DRHISTORY

Speed is slow to the point of spitting blood. After five months of review, they told me the reviewers had not provided any feedback, and then they directly closed my submission. We do not feel able to provide you with an editorial decision within a reasonable timeframe, and we believe it is unfair to further delay your manuscript. We are therefore closing your file, so that you have the opportunity to submit elsewhere. We have to say, this journal is really not good, and neither are the reviewers. Don't waste your time here

(0) 讚！ | Ocean Lee

Can I ask when will the submission under peer review be sent out for external review？

(0) 讚！ | DRHISTORY

Have you got any results? I applied on September 6th, and the technical review takes 21 days. During this period, I haven't received any replies to my emails. Checking the results a few days ago, I found out that the technical review was passed on the 27th, and on the 10th an invitation was sent to the reviewer

(0) 讚！ | fan@1225

Title: English Translation:

Under the Springer, the endocrine journal Hormones and Cancer was renamed Discover oncology. Prior to the renaming, it maintained a position around 3rd in the Chinese Academy of Sciences list, but after the rename, it was ranked as 2nd. It is unclear what relationship the journal has with the CAS. The editorial process of the journal is very lengthy, taking 40 days for the manuscript to be sent to peer review once in the hands of the editor. Technical checks usually require revisions, so it is advisable to stay away from it if you are in a rush

(12) 讚！ | Ocean Lee

Finally got the result? It has been under technical review for 4 days

(0) 讚！ | DRHISTORY

I have been waiting for over a month now, still in technical review, frustrating

(0) 讚！ | gfxxx

It has been in the technical review stage all the time, emails are not replied, and it has been transferred to others

(0) 讚！ | whelixy

This is also a garbage magazine, with a garbage editor-in-chief. It's been 50 days since submission, and we're still in the technical review stage, let alone editor assignment and review. There has been no reply at all. This kind of editor is worse than a pig or a dog. Do not waste your time on this garbage magazine

(1) 讚！ | qyw

How are you doing now? I just submitted it as well

(0) 讚！ | whelixy

Is this a new journal? The impact factor is not high, and it is classified as a second-tier journal in terms of size and category.

(0) 讚！ | zjcc1127

Who knows, the family members? It has been over a month since the submission and it is still in the technical review stage. Then they requested the withdrawal of the submission. It has been half a month since then and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | JUN-Z