Two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 太山莺莺

Review Speed: 6.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted in June, kept bouncing between "under review" and "reviewer assigned", major revisions in November, resubmitted in December and accepted after a week; in short, both the editor and reviewers were very meticulous, pointing out many unnoticed issues, totaling 30 issues big and small. The response letter was painstakingly written with over 9000 words, but it seemed both the editor and reviewers were very nice

(0) 讚！ | 天山白梦

How many reviewers will this journal invite? I submitted on September 4th, and it is currently in "Under Review" status. The date has been updated four times under this status. Can you please help me understand what is going on?

(0) 讚！ | 长安良奥

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: I just found out that it is the second district, I always thought it was the first district. The questions asked by the reviewers are very tricky and rigorous, and the article was revised twice. The review process is very long, from submission to final acceptance takes about half a year (22.6~23.1). Replying to the reviewers' comments made me doubt about life, but fortunately it was eventually accepted. For those in a hurry, please consider carefully

(0) 讚！ | 拂柳运良

Hello, I want to ask why I can't open the author guidelines for this magazine? Could you see it at that time?

(0) 讚！ | 明熙少爷

Is rejection fast?

(0) 讚！ | 暴风雪巧

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: Experimental; Ophthalmology Experience Sharing: A paper on basic experiments, which I personally feel is flashy and polished, submitted at the beginning of February, was not sent for review for over 3 weeks, directly requested for major revisions, and added some experiments. Revised in early April, requested for major revisions again at the end of April, and the reviewers raised many questions, focusing on the weaknesses. Also requested to show detailed images, made significant changes, returned in early June, and accepted in early July. In general, the journal is very rigorous, and the editors are also very nice. I followed up twice, and the attitude was very friendly, without becoming angry or rejecting the submission. The reviewers are also very skilled, their questions are too sharp, attempting to bypass any unnecessary debates

(0) 讚！ | 璃月嘉茂

Extensively search and list alternative journals; screen target journals; decide on target journal for submission

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the process of selecting publications?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

There are many journal classifications, how to choose the appropriate journal?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Is rejection fast?

(0) 讚！ | 明俊小公主

Fellow Daoist, how long have you been reviewing my manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Wade Turner

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Very slow, proceed with caution

(0) 讚！ | 留云英资

I won't accept it without verification, I already voted in 2019

(0) 讚！ | 爱勇三岁啦

Not yet, what about you?

(0) 讚！ | 上清以阳

I haven't changed completely yet, hahaha

(0) 讚！ | 坠星易槐

Have you submitted it? I also want to submit a bioinformatics article recently. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 坠星易槐

Does this magazine accept articles on bioinformatics?

(0) 讚！ | 上清以阳

Excuse me, do you accept overviews?

(0) 讚！ | 小采香吖

Do not

(0) 讚！ | 思云mm

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: First time submitting to SCI, got rejected!

(0) 讚！ | 书生典丽

A very responsible and efficient journal. This year's impact factor is higher than that of IOVS. The editor and executive editor are both extremely nice. Submitted on March 27; minor revision requested on May 30, four reviewers. Revision submitted on June 15 and accepted on July 5. Very efficient.

(0) 讚！ | qs20060606@163.com

It is said to be more basic

(0) 讚！ | 应龙新竹

My first scientific paper in life is finally completed, and I can graduate. The efficiency of the journal is quite high

(0) 讚！ | 振永酱大魔王

The first SCI in life is completed and you can finally graduate.The journal is very efficient.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous