Submitted on January 3
Received revised manuscript comments on January 23
Returned on February 3
Pre-accepted on February 21, format revised

(0) 讚！ | 小鑫

Submitted to ESM, rejected for review, one of the alternative options is CRPS. I feel like this journal is going to fold

(6) 讚！ | dataiyang

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | mm

The journal Cell has been like making dumplings outside of biology in recent years, positioning itself as high as it wants, but in fact, none of them have reached their goals. Matter is still eating the leftovers of the previous round of NC, SA, JACS, AM, either by invitation or by submission. How high can CRPS be as its recycling station in the end??? iScience just started with a NC positioning, but after several years, it has become a common part of the crowd

(1) 讚！ | Lab worker

Opinions differ on the quality of a journal, as the saying goes, different strokes for different folks. However, it is not appropriate for a high-level intellectual or a researcher to resort to insults and abuse when expressing their views. I won't say much about this, time will prove the excellence of the journal CRPS

(1) 讚！ | 平步青云

What groundbreaking article did you post up there, mindlessly bragging back and forth? CRPS, Matter, Chem are now tied together and still can't reach the impact of NC or SA, and the quality of the articles is on par with ACS Nano and AFM. First, think about whether you can take off the hat of the second district, and don't become the second Iscience

(2) 讚！ | Lab worker

To be honest, it's worrying that it won't stir up much of a storm, it's too tame

(0) 讚！ | letpub_2020

There is a high probability that it will decrease

(0) 讚！ | wenwenwenwenwen

It's getting harder to keep up. At this time last year, even the immediate IF was already 6.5

(0) 讚！ | Dr. g

Follow the root

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

Don't treat me like a grandpa

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

Test: Also blue and green development in order to let also um is also possible for people to come to the house to play with children after playing Do you have any friends of your own? Zhao Jinming, um, how um is it? Li Ke What um, I um yeah yeah ah yeah yeah grandfather puppets also Buddha grandfather Buddha um um um um um um grandfather ah ah ah play games I take myself to play games um um um um um um um um um um um um um um um um um um um test under my grandfather

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

Just watch

(0) 讚！ | SHANHEPLUS

CRPS's current impact factor is 5.8, which means it may drop to around 9.5 next year. ACS AMI currently has an impact factor of 6.0, and Chemical Science has an impact factor of 5.6. It would be great if we could enter the top quartile by the end of the year

(1) 讚！ | +和+

Thanks to the backing of the CNS sub-journal, CRPS has a good reputation. Currently, most researchers, when promoting their work, list it alongside NC, SA, JACS/ANGEW/PRL, or shortly after. The genes of CRPS are better than Advanced Science, but inferior to NC/SA. Cell, which is on par with Nature/Science, and its original major sub-journals do not publish articles in the materials science field, so they cannot directly transfer articles to CRPS like the Nature/Science series to ensure the quantity and quality of CRPS submissions. The later-established material-related new journals by Cell, such as Joule, Chem, and Matter, aim to be major sub-journals of Nature, also known as Cell major sub-journals, can transfer articles to CRPS. However, for these Cell major sub-journals to reach or approach the level of Nature major sub-journals, it will take time. These factors also mean that it will take some time for CRPS to reach the level of NC. Fortunately, CRPS has the platform of Cell, allowing it to team up with Joule, Chem, Matter, and other material-related journals. As long as Joule, Chem, Matter, and other related journals develop to a level higher than a certain point of NC, and the impact factor of CRPS is greater than 10, then CRPS has successfully achieved its goals

(78) 讚！ | 平步青云

Currently, CRPS is in the early stages of development, and the quality of its articles varies greatly. Some articles come from rejection from journals like Joule and Chem, and these articles are of similar quality to NC/AM/angew. There have been cases where a friend submitted a manuscript to CRPS after being rejected by Joule with three positives and one negative review. Another portion of articles comes from direct submissions, and the quality of these articles is also good, basically not lower than Small. On average, the current level of CRPS articles is roughly equivalent to ACS nano and AFM

(36) 讚！ | 平步青云

It should be the JMCA Small category, right? Submitted one AFM manuscript and got rejected, got rejected for Small, but this one got accepted

(0) 讚！ | wenwenwenwenwen

Far from the level of ACS NANO AFM... The average level is only SMALL, and it is even more impossible to get close to NC SA

(76) 讚！ | dataiyang

At present, CRPS is only at the level of journals such as ACS Nano, AFM, and ACS Materials Letters, and has not yet reached the level of Small NC/SA. Let's see how it will develop in the future

(0) 讚！ | 浪浪山打工仔122

Now Matter corresponds to AM, Chem is similar to JACS, CRPS is similar to AFM, and Chemical Science is at the same level

(0) 讚！ | Dr. g

05.09 submission; 05.25 major revision; 07.21 rework; 8.03 pre-acceptance. Overall, I feel that the CRPS editing efficiency is very high, and the reviewers are very professional. I hope to catch up with NC as soon as possible.

(5) 讚！ | BZJ-

Roughly speaking, the impact factor of nc\sa is still somewhat lacking, but it is expected to catch up in the next three years. The estimated impact factor for 2024 is expected to be 10+.

(0) 讚！ | King Baum

How is the current recognition level of this journal? Approximately what level has it reached?

(2) 讚！ | QSCGY

I thought CRPS would reach 10 and Matter would reach 20, but both investments turned out to be failures...

(0) 讚！ | 未来的院士

The impact factor of the journal that was just released this year is 8.9, almost reaching 9, which is slightly regrettable. Cell Reports and Chemical Science had impact factors close to 10 last year, and this year the IFs for the two journals are 8.8 and 8.4 respectively. Compared to CR and CS, it feels decent. The sister journal of CRPS, Cell Reports Medicine, had impact factors of 17 and 14.3 last year and this year, respectively, already approaching or surpassing small NC and SA. I hope CRPS can work hard and catch up.

(15) 讚！ | 平步青云