The editor rejected the submission after 40 days, which is a little frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | Edgar Isaiah

My feeling is that the process of undergoing editorial assessment should have a fixed cycle, typically around one to two months.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: Melanoma
Experience sharing: After submission, it has been undergoing editorial assessment for over a month, and is now under review.

(0) 讚！ | 北风爱梅

How are things going now?

(0) 讚！ | 是彗云吖

Hello, it has been a month and the status is still the same. Has it been audited externally?

(0) 讚！ | 翌萌mm

The status of logging into the mobile system is undergoing Editorial assessment, while the status of logging into the computer system is Under Review. Has it been sent out for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 康成公子

Finally accepted, it took three months in total. Unlike some European journals in the BBA series, the review process took three months

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏美媛

Do non-OA magazines charge page fees?

(0) 讚！ | 舒昕公子

The overview I submitted was rejected and transferred to another journal within a month. The journals recommended by the new journal were all in the 4th quartile or lower

(1) 讚！ | 削月光霁

I also submitted a manuscript. When can I expect to receive the reviewer comments?

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵痴梦

Do we have results now?

(0) 讚！ | 削月光霁

Is it possible to be rejected after the second review?

(0) 讚！ | 墟散润华

The first review took 2 months and 21 days, with minor revisions. It was resubmitted three days later and accepted one week after that. The efficiency was quite high

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏美媛

My review paper has been under review for 2 months and 1 day, but I still haven't received any feedback

(1) 讚！ | 神古春岚

Do you need to consider the Impact Factor when selecting journals?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

What is IF?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: 1. The efficiency is very high, with both first review and second review completed within two months. 2. The opinions of the reviewers are highly respected, with two reviewers for the first review, both requiring major revisions. One reviewer for the second review, with only one issue, requiring minor revisions. After the minor revisions, it was re-submitted for review. The reviewers had no further comments, and it was accepted!

(0) 讚！ | 爱欢mm

Reviewed for over three months, received feedback from three reviewers, and was rejected

(0) 讚！ | 明冠以莲

Reviewed for more than three months, gave three reviewers comments, was rejected

(0) 讚！ | 775111139@qq.com

Reviewed for 3 months and 7 days, received feedback from 3 reviewers, and recommended to resubmit

(0) 讚！ | 巴蜀景同

Review 3 months and 7 days, gave the opinions of 3 reviewers, recommended to switch

(0) 讚！ | 梅子

Help, I can't find the edit button while revising my manuscript in Experimental Dermatology, it's driving me crazy

(0) 讚！ | 桃花听莲

Do I need to find reviewers for this magazine myself? I can't access the webpage to search for reviewers. Thank you. I'm really in a hurry

(0) 讚！ | Paddy Dorothea

This magazine has very strict review standards and high requirements. When drawing illustrations, you must strictly follow the instructions. The figure numbers must be in vertical order, starting from a, b, c

(0) 讚！ | 是曼青吖

The journal performs a rigorous review and has high standards. When preparing your figures, you must do it in accordance with the journal requirements. The figure panels should be labeled ABC and must be aligned vertically.

(0) 讚！ | xyjunhui224@sina.com