How long do you maintain the "transferred in" status? I am still in this state and feeling anxious.

(0) 讚！ | yiyiww

The review process for submissions transferred here is very fast. May I ask if this journal is indexed in EI? Is there a tendency for it to be included in SCI?

(0) 讚！ | Leo_Zl

I was also recommended to come here.

(0) 讚！ | 克洛里

Hello Keaidou, what are the opinions of your three reviewers and the editor?

(0) 讚！ | sga

To SGA: My feelings are similar to the situation you described. There were three reviewers in the external audit feedback.

(0) 讚！ | keaidou

Boss, my article has been reviewed for the second time by the first reviewer. Is it because the opinions of the first and second reviewers are inconsistent that a third reviewer is being sought?

(0) 讚！ | sga

To AAARobot: Thank you, my second reviewer has also completed the review, now waiting for the decision of the editor, ready for minor revisions!

(0) 讚！ | sga

To sga: My copyright was issued after submitting the revised manuscript. I am not sure how many reviewers this journal will assign, and I am also unsure about the second reviewer. However, I believe the review process should be completed within three months. There is no need to worry, just continue with your work. Submitting a manuscript takes time, but delaying the progress of your research is the biggest loss.

(0) 讚！ | AAARobot

Hey, I wanted to ask if the copyright is issued after submitting the revised manuscript, and does this journal usually only use 2 reviewers? It took about a month and a half for the first reviewer to provide feedback after I entered external review, and now I'm waiting to find the second reviewer. Do I have to wait a long time again for the second reviewer, and I'm getting a little anxious.

(0) 讚！ | sga

I have been in the review and editing process for more than twenty days, why is it so slow?

(0) 讚！ | YCH0605

@xuewei Thank you! 555 It seems like my work has been sent back out to the reviewer again.

(0) 讚！ | keaidou

@keaidou I am the second reviewer. Once the review is completed, it will become a review report and be delivered.

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei

Congratulations!! May I ask if your process is for the second reviewer to agree to review directly after the review is collected?

(0) 讚！ | keaidou

10.2 Submission of revised manuscript (provide detailed responses to each comment from every reviewer when submitting, you will be asked to fill in the copyright form promptly, with a deadline. The revised manuscript will then be sent back to the original reviewers. If they all agree, it should be accepted. If there are still issues, new reviewers may need to be found, which could lead to a longer review process for some students who have revised their manuscript)； 
10.16 Ready to accept (tentatively accepted, the journal will now check the necessary documents, if everything is fine, it will be accepted. If there are issues, you will be contacted via email to submit additional materials); 
10.21 Formal acceptance (officially accepted)

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei

6.26 transferred in;
7.4 editing review;
7.13 out to reviewer (actually looking for the first reviewer);
7.16 at least one reviewer is reviewing (actually the first reviewer is reviewing);
7.23 out to reviewer (looking for the second reviewer);
9.17 at least one reviewer is reviewing (the second reviewer is reviewing, and so on, if all reviewers agree on revisions and no additional reviewers are sought, unsure how many reviewers are needed, may vary by field);
9.21 review reports delivered (editor has received all reviewers' comments, then with decision (editor decision-making also takes a few days));
9.27 received revision decision (each reviewer's comments need to be carefully addressed one by one, pay attention to the deadline for submitting the revised manuscript).

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei

I feel that the editing efficiency is high and the reviewers are careful and attentive. The comments provided delve deep into my research field and have greatly inspired me. I seem to belong to the category of manuscripts with longer review periods, as it took quite a while to find a second reviewer. Perhaps the differences in fields also affect the review time. The submission process is as follows. My understanding may be biased and is only for reference. I hope this information is helpful to everyone.

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei

I have also changed from being the first reviewer to looking for reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | baobaoshadudu

How is it going now? Have you accepted it? How long does it usually take for the review process?

(0) 讚！ | 时间（煮雨）

Does this journal require payment? The original journal did not require payment for submission, does this one require it?

(0) 讚！ | 时间（煮雨）

My article has been stuck at the "awaiting referee reports" stage for almost a month now, and there has been no change.

(0) 讚！ | sga

My paper went from being agreed by the first reviewer for review to being invited for review. It has been two weeks since submission.

(0) 讚！ | keaidou

@sci must go! The first reviewer should have finished, so we are looking for a second reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei

From the first reviewer, my manuscript has evolved into requesting more reviewers. Does anyone know what this means?

(0) 讚！ | sci必行！

Hello, may I ask how long it usually takes to stay in the "awaiting referee reports" status? Has the review been completed now? I have been in this status for almost a month.

(0) 讚！ | maguilin

The interface shows that it has been almost two months since my manuscript was submitted for review and there has been no response within the three-month timeframe.

(0) 讚！ | @xuewei