Why are there a large number of references to articles from this journal in the one I wrote, even though I have not actually cited them?

(0) 讚！ | NUNY

$990 US dollars plus tax

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Completely agree!

(0) 讚！ | COKE

"Your relationship with the editor is very appropriate, this critique is spot on."

(1) 讚！ | A passenger

A master at IF! Whether it is authoritative or not depends on whether international peers recognize it, IF is not important!

(0) 讚！ | A passenger

Has the quality of the paper you read with that one eye improved? The proportion of domestic experts has increased, hasn't it?

(0) 讚！ | abaflu1

Even if it's not indexed in SCI, how did it go from being in the fourth quartile last year to the first quartile this year? Are we just fooling ourselves? How many respected experts in the field actually recognize journals that manipulate data? How many foreigners (excluding Iranians and Saudis) are involved? It's mostly Chinese so-called experts and their followers publishing in it, and it's clearly a tool for editors and editorial board members to network. I suggest that an international retraction organization thoroughly investigate this journal.

(1) 讚！ | abaflu1

Since November 1st, 2023, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge of $990 US dollars plus tax per processed paper for production costs and Open Access fees, which applies to all accepted articles (excluding editorials) after peer review; Rejected articles are exempt from this charge.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Unlike ESCI, SCIE refers to the latter.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Since November 1st, 2023, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge of $990 US dollars plus tax per processed paper for production costs and Open Access fees. This fee is applicable to all accepted articles (excluding editorials) after peer review. Rejected articles are not subject to any charges.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Since November 1st, 2023, authors are required to pay a processing fee of $990 US dollars plus tax per paper for production costs and Open Access fees. This fee applies to all accepted articles (except editorials) after peer review; rejected articles are not charged.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

May I ask approximately how much is the total payment?

(0) 讚！ | jj

How much is the approximate payment required?

(0) 讚！ | jj

May I ask how much it will cost in total for a successful submission?

(0) 讚！ | jj

Isn't now Scim?

(0) 讚！ | yb8347

Setting aside the social complexities between the "big shots" and the academicians' group, the quality of this publication is just at the level of a third or fourth tier journal. During the era of academic cliques, some people seek to gain authority in discourse. It is likely that all students were also persuaded by their teachers to submit articles, but they must understand the various relationships and rules behind this

(1) 讚！ | adadadadaddad

When can AGER ascend SCI?

(0) 讚！ | kindly

Just kidding?

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Farting

(0) 讚！ | COKE

The relationship between you and the editor

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Well said, approached with reason

(0) 讚！ | COKE

I would like to ask, how many review experts are usually needed for AGER external review?

(0) 讚！ | kindly

Petroleum geology is a journal in the first tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences geoscience category. Fuel, Energy, and a journal sponsored by a certain central enterprise are in the first tier of the engineering category. MPG is in the second tier, and its Impact Factor has dropped significantly. The long-established AAPG is in the third tier, with an Impact Factor that has been persistently low.

Some people sarcastically say that the sudden rise in AGER's ranking is a miracle in a major country. In fact, in the first year of being included in ESCI, there was no Impact Factor, naturally making it a fourth-tier journal. In the second year, it received an Impact Factor of 8.2, so the ranking increase is reasonable. Even though the Chinese Academy of Sciences' rankings have been criticized, the Impact Factor still holds some weight.

In the past two years, although there has been an increase in high-profile submissions, including from domestic and foreign academicians, some submissions are indeed lacking in quality.

Those in petroleum geology who want to publish in a first-tier journal of geosciences in the Chinese Academy of Sciences should not submit to AGER. Can't they collaborate with large teams from universities and the Chinese Academy of Sciences to publish in Geology, GCA, EPSL, and GRL?

Approach Chinese new journals rationally and make rational submissions. Wishing the journals continued success.

Venting from a grassroots scientific researcher

(13) 讚！ | mzw

Miracle of a Great Country! Power of a Great Country!

(0) 讚！ | 执恋星君

Congratulations, the zone has soared from Zone 4 directly to Zone 1, indicating that the level of articles included in AGER is highly competitive. I think this is a great national miracle!!!

(24) 讚！ | 分区王