Due to the recent suspension of the IEEE TIV journal by Clarivate Analytics, there have been various discussions on channels with uncertain authenticity. LetPub, as a neutral platform, will not favor any party. Before further investigation results are announced, LetPub will suspend discussions in the comment section.

(20) 讚！ | LetPub官方账号

The sooner the on-hold status is lifted, the greater assistance it will be for the Chinese community in the transportation sector.

(2) 讚！ | 每日科研

In the field of transportation, there are only two transactions. TIV has been put on hold, while TITS is controlled by foreigners. TITS is very slow and unfriendly to Chinese people. Frankly speaking, Chinese articles cannot even get the attention of foreigners at TITS. For Chinese people in the transportation field, TIV is considered very friendly and has high-quality regular papers. As for the critics, they are too biased and difficult to communicate with. We can only wish them well in other journals. Of course, after TIV is put on hold, other journals will become more competitive. Critics can look at the quality of TIV's regular papers and hope that their papers will succeed.

(2) 讚！ | 每日科研

I want to ask the netizens, I submitted my article in early March, contacted the chief editor's assistant three times in between, and now it has been five months. The latest contact to inquire about the progress of the review received a response of "has been forwarded to the AE, please be patient". What is the current situation, has anyone else encountered this before? Share your experiences.

(0) 讚！ | MingTZ

Can I ask how we know that the reviewer's comments have been extended by three weeks?

(0) 讚！ | echo21

A very good journal, is a benchmark in the field of intelligent vehicles in China. I wish the journal a better and better future!

(1) 讚！ | Shawn

One TIV was accepted in August last year, followed by another acceptance in TITS and TTE. The next two articles had a submission period of up to 9 months (both going through major and minor revisions before acceptance), while TIV only took 2 months. So I thought about submitting another article before graduating at the end of the year, even though TIV is not a top journal. Considering its increasing impact and shorter processing time, I submitted it (I believe the quality of this article is similar to the previous three). TIV received a first review result in two months, rejected for resubmission (in fact, the reviewers all gave major revisions, similar to my first accepted TIV article, so those accepted or just submitted may encounter this situation). After making revisions, I received permission from the editor-in-chief to resubmit. Just as I was about to resubmit, I was informed that the journal was on hold, which was beyond my control, so I had to submit to another journal. This article, which was supposed to be submitted before the end of the year, is no longer needed. Based on the reviews, this article was likely to be accepted.

Reflecting on my submission experiences in different journals, I did not encounter any issues with the review process at TIV (aside from its speed, which is a blessing for graduate students). Since our group is involved in large engineering projects, everyone's research progresses along with the project schedule, making us very tired and busy. As a result, it wasn't until the final two years of my PhD that I had time to write papers. On the other hand, I have encountered malicious reviews in other journals (either vague or harsh comments from reviewers).

(1) 讚！ | Daydream174

Some people doubt Wang's academic ability and even bring up that article on DAO.

First, Wang is over sixty years old, he doesn't need to fight on the front line anymore. His current academic status is earned through years of hard work, he is already a general, you can't expect a general to go to the front line and fight with a knife. Even if he is willing, it would be a waste of talent.

Second, what he needs to do is to see the future trends in scientific research, control the direction of research, and leave the basic work to his subordinates. When others don't know what to do, he can guide them. That's why so many articles bear his name.

Third, going back to the DAO, some people say that it has nothing to do with decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO), it has a different name (I can't remember the specific name, too lazy to look it up, anyway, it's not DAO). Little do they know, the first DAO article in China was published by him, these papers can be found online. It's just a matter of different perspectives, he just sees it from a higher level than you.

(0) 讚！ | 支持TIV

3. It is ridiculous that someone would attack the name of the "Parallel Theory".

First of all, even from an adult perspective, directly attacking someone's theory name seems childish.

Secondly, there has always been academic debate about this theory, it's just not easy to determine a winner in academic debates. Those critics, even if you really want to attack, should read some of these papers and know how to question it. Otherwise, it just seems laughable.

Thirdly, many people say there are many parallel papers. Those are from top researchers who are willing to believe in his theory and work on it, and those who are not willing won't even use the word parallel. If you just download one paper to read and see what it says, you will know how to criticize it, instead of stupidly saying "parallel-based". A theory is only in trouble when no one uses it, the fact that so many people are discussing it means it is at least currently valuable. If you say "this is because of King's influence" that so many people use parallel, then you really underestimate the academic community.

4. The suspension of TIV is not just a loss for King, but also a loss for the Chinese academic community. Even if you don't think highly of King, don't forget that he is one of the few Chinese people who run journals. Regardless of his motives for running journals, the beneficiaries are the vast number of Chinese students. Those who have submitted papers know that foreign journals discriminate against Chinese people (this is my feeling, I won't argue if your feeling is different). Furthermore, King's actions are common in foreign journals, so why single him out. You don't think those foreign scholars are all naive, do you?

(0) 讚！ | 支持TIV

5. Most importantly, the investigation into this matter is not yet concluded. It's better to wait for the results before jumping to conclusions. Someone even fabricated an email claiming that King manipulated the review process, which seems very serious. You can release the information with personal details hidden, so everyone can see what's going on. I don't believe that a leading international consulting company would make judgments before completing an investigation.

For those who are just watching for entertainment, those who are planning to pursue postgraduate or doctoral studies, and those who are engaged in scientific research at the grassroots level, please pay attention and don't let others use you as a tool.

(0) 讚！ | 支持TIV

A small wave of people online are maliciously attacking Wang Feiyue for unknown reasons. I am only stating what I have seen, and everyone can evaluate it for themselves. Of course, this is just my personal opinion, and I welcome discussion, but please refrain from personal attacks.

Many people are bringing up the "chat with gpt" letter.

First, this is a letter, not the so-called "top that you can't publish, others can publish as a blog" that some people are talking about. The content of the two types of articles is different. (Some people argued when I said it was not a formal article, I won't argue about whether it is formal or not here, it is not the same thing.)

Second, this is an expression of Wang's academic thoughts. He is not trying to increase his influence by publishing in these journals, he is only expressing academic ideas. It is normal for some people in the academic community to disagree, but don't deliberately exaggerate or distort, giving the general public a false impression, this is not fair.

Third, these types of articles are used by the chief editor to enhance the influence of the journal. This is why some people say that Wang's articles account for a certain percentage. If you look closely at his articles over 23 years, how many articles he is listed as an author on, you will see that it is much fewer than when his influence was lower. He has used his influence to bring the journal to where it is now, allowing you to submit articles, and yet some people are still attacking him, not only attacking but also deliberately distorting the truth, this is not fair.

(4) 讚！ | 支持TIV

Give the blackheads a break.

(0) 讚！ | 抵制者需要降降火

Create a group and confront him.

(0) 讚！ | 抵制者需要降降火

Not only do we need to delay others, but we also need to discredit the journal and make everyone who has received TIV not dare to bring it out.

(0) 讚！ | 抵制者需要降降火

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 要了

(0) 讚！ | 抵制者需要降降火

To be honest, it's not very polite to address someone this way.

(0) 讚！ | ccchensss

I hope IEEE TIV can maintain its efficiency. It is a good journal and the ability to publish results in a timely manner is indeed a blessing for the community.

(2) 讚！ | vvgod

Girl? Is this how you refer to women? Is your quality so low? At least the people at letpub are graduate students, how could there be someone with such low quality like you?

(0) 讚！ | lxl

Support official data.

(0) 讚！ | kksjchaissq

But the chief editor is Chinese, buddy. Why don't you take a look at why some so-called "top journals" are particularly difficult for Chinese people to get into? Such as TR: A???

(0) 讚！ | kksjchaissq

A good journal, under the guidance of those with good intentions, has become like this under the attack of the trolls. Professor Wang is probably more in mourning than heartbroken now.

(3) 讚！ | kksjchaissq

Yes, before it was a decision made on the same day, now it is a decision made every week, and it seems like the reviewers' feedback has been extended by three weeks.

(3) 讚！ | astronomy

Has it slowed down recently? It used to take just one day to go from "awaiting admin process" to "awaiting AE assignment", but now it's been two or three days with no progress.

(1) 讚！ | vvgod

Tell a joke: Isn't Tiv owned by IEEE? Aren't they foreigners?

(1) 讚！ | AI_BOT

Does whitening also need to start at eight in the morning?

(0) 讚！ | yrtert