6.9 Major revision, but not many comments from two reviewers
6.10 revision submit
6.17 awaiting reviewer assignment
Is it still not yet awaiting reviewer scores means the reviewers have not accepted the review yet, really tired, hope not to change reviewers again, almost every review changes reviewers

(0) 讚！ | Grapymage

I would like to ask what the wording is for asking Feiyue to resubmit. In my case, it is "However, I believe the topic of your paper is interesting and beneficial to TIV, therefore I would like to invite you to revise thoroughly according to our review reports, and resubmit your revision as a New paper. If you do so, please let me know before your submission and provide me with a detailed report on your revision, I will let you know my opinion. ..... I don't know if it's the same (to determine if there is still hope for resubmission)."

(0) 讚！ | fvweibrvuerbo

Do any of you know why a paper would remain "Under review" and then move to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" for an extended period of time?

(0) 讚！ | AlanLiang

School email, edu.cn

(0) 讚！ | psh

Classmate, I wanted to ask, what email address do you usually use to submit contributions to tiv on your end?

(0) 讚！ | 帅帅的阿文

The submission to TIV was directly rejected with an email saying that IEEE TIV no longer accepts submissions from non-institutional email addresses such as gmail.com or 163.com. A letter of explanation must be provided for authors without association with an institution, such as a university or company. If you are still interested in TIV, please resubmit your manuscript through a new institutional address. What email addresses do people usually use for submissions?

(0) 讚！ | 帅帅的阿文

The first time rejected, the invitation to resubmit was given. After the second resubmission, 1 accept + 1 reject. The invitation to resubmit was declined again. The reviewer who rejected it felt that they did not understand and gave a lot of unchangeable comments

(0) 讚！ | NookLook

In "Under review," the "U" is capitalized because it has been sent for external review

(0) 讚！ | 帅帅的阿文

Yes, write a reply to the editor on the first page. Submit the rest as normal, but it is suggested to attach the reply to the editor at the beginning of the response

(0) 讚！ | sc

Hello, I would like to inquire about the uppercase "U" in "Under review" of the submission to IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. Is it for editor review or for review by external reviewers? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 努力暴富

Not opting for a conflict of interest statement, I also mentioned in the comments that none of the authors are members of the editorial board

(0) 讚！ | 小段

Please reject the submitted manuscript directly and send an email stating that authors must fill in "Conflict of Interest" in Step 6 of the Submission: Details & Comments if one of the co-authors is a member of the Editorial Board of IEEE TIV

(0) 讚！ | 干饭大王

I would like to ask the original poster what the reason for being reject-inappropriate is? I also received the same result today. I made modifications in the afternoon and submitted them for review, and I received the result at 10 pm

(0) 讚！ | Nan

We are in it, so we should do it

(0) 讚！ | PeterPig

Okay, thank you. Also, for my first paper submission, do I need to include author bios at the end?

(0) 讚！ | 帅帅的阿文

2024.3.26 Submitted
2024.3.29 Under Review
2024.4.19 Awaiting Recommendation
2024.4.21 Revision

(0) 讚！ | zzz

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 关东第一帅

Is there nothing left to output, is the money in place?

(0) 讚！ | 抵制IEEE TIV

Authors can choose among 4 kinds of papers, each with its suggested length in IEEE style:

Regular Papers: 10 pages
Short Papers: 6 pages
Practitioner Papers: 6 pages
Survey Papers: 18 pages
An author may submit papers that exceeds the suggested length but after the final acceptance, provided they pay an overlength charge of $175.00 (US dollars) for each extra page

(0) 讚！ | PeterPig

Everyone is treated like this, during the submission period they will be invited to review, but many times it is not the reviewer who actively runs away, but the editor-in-chief making the reviewer passively run away, you know, while reviewing, they are not allowed to review, and they forcibly switch reviewers. Even if this journal is disgusting, everyone still takes peer-reviewed papers seriously during the submission period, but the editor's actions are really outrageous

(0) 讚！ | asdasb456

People submit to this journal not because it has a faster review process compared to other journals, the editor-in-chief is doing well in this aspect. Changing reviewers halfway is not because the previous reviewer disappeared, I am also an active reviewer for this journal, and every submission will be sent to me. I have also received previously revised manuscripts that were sent to me, only when the previous reviewer disappeared will a new one be assigned. Even for revisions, I will reassess whether the revised manuscript meets the high quality requirements of this journal, and definitely won't allow any passable work to slip through. Isn't the most important aspect of a journal the quality of its reviewers, so what we should do is to become responsible reviewers. The most important thing for the editor-in-chief is to maintain an efficient and effective review process. Just a thought to share

(0) 讚！ | xjp99v5

I would like to ask my fellow students, is there a page limit for the first submission to TIV? How many pages can it not exceed?

(0) 讚！ | 帅帅的阿文

Don't stop, brother. Keep going, I haven't seen enough yet

(0) 讚！ | 抵制IEEE TIV

You may have misunderstood. After my second revision, there were two reviewers, one accepted and one required major revisions. Then I made revisions according to their comments and submitted it back. However, during the third review, the editor replaced the positive reviewer with a random reviewer who rejected the paper. The one who required major revisions in the third review only needed minor revisions, but the paper was ultimately rejected with no chance of resubmission. The opinions of the reviewers varied greatly, yet the editor refused to add another reviewer to make a decision. The editor even rejected the paper without bothering to provide a reason, treating the time of young researchers as a joke. This is the reason for everyone's anger

(0) 讚！ | asdasb456

IEEE has a rule that states, 'Under no circumstances can a paper be accepted without revision if it receives at least one REJECT recommendation from any reviewer.' There also seems to be a rule that states, 'If there is one ACCEPT and one MINOR, the AE has the final decision to accept.' Your situation may be a problem with the AE, such as if the AE does not understand your field well or is too busy to carefully review your manuscript, and simply rejects it upon seeing a REJECT. This kind of situation can happen in all journals, considering the different situations of AEs. I must say you are not very lucky

(0) 讚！ | Claude