9.15 submitted
9.16 with editor
9.18 under review
10.14 major revision
10.28 submitted / in revision
10.31 accept / on line

Translation:
9.15 submitted
9.16 with editor
9.18 under review
10.14 major revision
10.28 submitted / in revision
10.31 accepted / online

(0) 讚！ | bioxiong

Material Chemistry Field; I feel that it is easy to be accepted by this journal. The performance of the things made is relatively poor, but the synthesis process is smooth, and the characterization is complete. Only one advantage of the molecule is emphasized, and the other bad ones are taken lightly. It was accepted directly after minor revision.

(0) 讚！ | chunlai007

is not saying very soon, how come I selectd for more than 30 days or under review, it’s really catchingMad

(2) 讚！ | 无名

article started the OL, because of the novelty problem, rejected.After the select to ADSC, two reviewers, one agreed to receive, one refused, and suggested to switch to EJOC.Later, there was no way, because I didn't want to toss any more. I selectd for ejoc on March 28 and received it directly on March 30 without modification.Although it is a bit lost, it is a thing, and then continue to cheer.

(1) 讚！ | 失忆的鱼

Still want to say: speed really fast

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

I started to submit in high-level synthesis and catalysis.Later, I didn't give up and selectd for JOC. The five reviewers 3 refused to accept 2, and finally the tragedy.There is no way to modify the EJOC according to the results of the review of the higher synthesis and catalysis, and modify it after 8 days of receiving.I am still very happy in my heart.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This article was first submitted to OrgLett in September 2012. Because the synthesis is not novel, two trialsThe drafters are reject, but they appreciate our work and suggest that we switch to Synthesis or Synlett.I am not too reconciled. According to the reviewer's opinion, I made an appropriate change. 2012-10-24 selectd for EJOC in the form of Full paper. The editor of 2012-11-13 received my article directly, but it still needs to be based on the reviewer's opinion.To answer or modify accordingly, the first reviewer proposed some small problems that were well resolved; the second reviewer felt that I needed to discuss the mechanism for further discussion.Two days later, the editor sent me the third review

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

. My work is not new, but the workload is very large. I will submitted the full text at the end of November 2011 and receive it in about 20 days.Upon reply, the reviewers were two minor repairs, one overhaul, and the article was accepted directly.I feel that if the work is well organized and has certain scientific significance, it is easy to select.Moreover, the form of the journal is also very formal. I think it is very systematic and the evaluation is objective.It is recommended that friends who come across the wall refer to it.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

20 days to first opinion.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

master stage and once hit.Although a few minor questions were raised, ASAP was hanged after the answer.Efficiency can still be.I feel that my work is normal. I wanted to select for SYNLETT. Later, the boss said that I tried it and the effect was not bad.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is good, select once, accept it directly after half a month, and then modify it.Reviewers are more responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The only advantage of this publication is that the review speed is not bad (just compared to other publications in Europe), the overall innovation requirements of the article are not very high, but you are requiredThe article has its own unique features. If the innovation is not enough, the reviewer or editor will let you increase the data to submit in full text.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

selectd twice and hit twice!The journal is of good quality and the influence factor of the journal will continue to improve!The reason is that in the willy database, the organic synthesis class has only the following factor 5, and a lot of papers will fall into EJOC.The requirements for new ideas are not very high, as long as the work is done systematically and comprehensively, you can hit!

(24) 讚！ | 匿名

Publications can also be reviewed and faster!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名