Oh, by the way, we also encountered a reviewer who sent an email saying they had reviewed the manuscript and asked us for money (we didn't agree, so we didn't take their feedback). I can only say that this journal is completely corrupt from the editors to the reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的守望

Pure **** journal, first review takes 1 month, 2 reviewers. Thought it was normal, right? After revisions, only one reviewer's opinion in the second review. After revising again, the original reviewer approved, and another reviewer was introduced. After another revision, a new reviewer was added, making it the fifth round. It took 7 months, and the last reviewer finally agreed, but asked for modifications again! They called it polishing! The email casually said the article has been evaluated and needs to be revised according to the comments. What a joke, all reviewers agreed, no one mentioned language issues! There's a reason why this trash journal was kicked out of Scopus, I won't consider it again in the future. There are also many victims in the comments section, don't submit your work here, take the advice!

(0) 讚！ | 麦田里的守望

Oh no, this is so frustrating!

(0) 讚！ | 爱斯维尔

It took three months for the first review, and it took a long time to find a reviewer. After revision, only one reviewer's opinion was received for the second review. The original reviewer approved the revised version, but when two new reviewers were introduced, the paper was rejected immediately. The whole process took more than five months, with multiple revisions and refinements. We will not consider submitting to this journal again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 烈火-纲

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 Focus on research direction: tumor Experience sharing: Trashy journals, rejected after six months of peer review without finding reviewers, beware.

(0) 讚！ | 金刚统维

How are you now? Have you received it?

(0) 讚！ | 爱斯维尔

Today received the message, but have not mentioned the layout fee. Only sent a link to the publishing policy.

(0) 讚！ | 八极雨妍

Remove sci.

(0) 讚！ | 金刚统维

Submission received: May 31, 2024
Submission is under technical check: May 31, 2024
Submission passed technical check: June 1, 2024
Ready for editorial assignment: June 1, 2024
Editor assigned: June 3, 2024
Reviewer(s) invited: June 13, 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted: June 13, 2024
Reviewer report(s) received: June 20, 2024

It should be July instead of June here, as I accessed this interface in July. The peer review comments have been with the editor for 3 weeks now, with no updates. Official responses only come after reminders.

(0) 讚！ | JoJo Stark

How long is your review process?

(0) 讚！ | 爱斯维尔

Excluded from the Scopus database, the next step may be to be excluded from SCI, and the peer review process is incredibly slow. It is also possible that there may be a major scandal.

(0) 讚！ | 金刚统维

It has really been three months and still no news, it's really too slow!!

(0) 讚！ | 爱斯维尔

Can I ask everyone, this magazine sent an email saying they have received our submission, but they haven't asked for the payment for the page yet. They keep sending emails saying "Publishing agreement form needs to be completed soon!" However, we haven't received any related emails. Has anyone else experienced this before? How long does it usually take for a submission to go from "Submission is in publishing and rights" to being published?

(0) 讚！ | 极乐婉君

Can this magazine choose non-OA publication?

(0) 讚！ | HFLDH

What are you talking about?

(0) 讚！ | 金刚统维

How are you now?

(0) 讚！ | 金刚统维

What experiment is this?

(0) 讚！ | 御阪俊德

Have you found it now?

(0) 讚！ | 龟甲念雪

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Editor assigned
On 03 Nov, 2023
Submission checks complete
On 02 Nov, 2023
First submitted to European Journal of Medical Research
On 01 Nov, 2023
Has this status been going on for more than three months, indicating that an editor has not been found yet?

(0) 讚！ | Ernest Judith

Bioinformatics + Experiment, this journal is extremely slow, Submission received on 2023.08.15, and now it has been half a year. In the meantime, I have sent several emails to inquire about the status, all of which were replied by the official. The last inquiry was informed that the review has been completed and waiting for the editor's decision. Finally, I was told that it was rejected, and there was no review comments, which made me doubt if it was ever sent for external review. After dragging on for half a year, I hope everyone can see the situation of this journal clearly and submit their manuscript rationally

(0) 讚！ | Frederica Collins

Are you a student from Guangxi Medical University?

(0) 讚！ | 凯瑟琳华莱士

Reviewer speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 95.0
Research focus: Diabetes
Experience sharing: Lasted four months, invited two reviewers, passed smoothly after the first revision

(0) 讚！ | Myra Camilla

How to determine the number of reviewers to invite?

(0) 讚！ | 南川海薇

After waiting for 6 months, we invited 33 reviewers to review the revised submission, which feels like a vicious cycle

(0) 讚！ | 凡波小公主

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Clinical experience sharing: At 2 months, it was returned for revision, and now it has been more than three months since the revision. There has been no progress despite reminders, it is really too slow. I'm tired of waiting

(0) 讚！ | 坠星秋珊