This journal takes several months for the first review, so slow

(0) 讚！ | 笑看这世界

It's been over a year and I still haven't been hired

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

Hey bro, how long have you been under review? I've been with the editor for 18 days too, it's frustrating

(0) 讚！ | Ohm

Who is the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

Update: After the third rebuttal, the editor took 3 days to directly accept it. They didn't even bother with that reviewer. I hope everyone encounters fair reviewers and editors!!!

(0) 讚！ | NPC

I'll just leave a footprint. Submitted on August 16th, I encountered a crazy reviewer who insisted on me changing the model. I politely declined, but the reviewer rejected it. I provided ample evidence, and although the current method has limitations, it is still well received in the finite element field. Just submitted, fingers crossed

(6) 讚！ | NPC

Reply to "Big Brother": Posted on 2023-08-15 09:13:31
Your time is quite normal, not slow at all.

The second review took 3 months (including the previous first review + revisions, totaling 6 months). It is considered quite slow, as the second reviews of other people were completed within 1 month, and the articles submitted during the same period have already been published. The second review changed the reviewer and required several more months of work

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

Sure enough, after changing to a new reviewer, the previous reviewer accepted all of them, but the new reviewer provided major revisions, raising 5 questions, requiring another round of major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

Your pace is actually quite normal. It's not slow at all

(0) 讚！ | 大表哥

Extremely slow, there are reasons for the low impact factor.
Submitted on 2/13/2023.
Under review on 2/18/2023.
Required reviews complete on 3/11/2023.
Major revision given with a 2-month timeframe.
Sent to two reviewers for the first review.
Revised manuscript submitted on 5/4/2023.
Under review on 5/6/2023.
Date changed on 5/16/2023.
Date changed on 6/9/2023.
One reviewer completed on 6/15/2023.
Date changed on 6/25/2023.
Second reviewer accepted the review on 6/29/2023.
Second reviewer completed the review on 8/1/2023.
In the tracking system, four reviewers were invited. It seems that two of the first reviewers declined.
The editor from Tsinghua University has not processed it yet today.

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | Tongxiaomu

It has been 21 days, still in the hands of editing.

(0) 讚！ | ZZH

I have been working on this submission for more than half a month, and it is still in the hands of the editor. Why is it taking so long?

(0) 讚！ | ZZH

Solid Mechanics authoritative journals. Now the efficiency is getting higher, receiving review comments in 20 days, two reviewers, their opinions are very professional, and they have high writing requirements. After submitting the revised manuscript, it will be accepted within a week.

(11) 讚！ | jqd583

2021.10.15 Submission
2021.12.10 Two reviewers, major revisions in comments
2022.1.10 Revised
2022.2.23 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 元帅呀

Pushed for 11 months, made a small repair, and the result is not bad.

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

It has been 11 months, and it is still under review. Why is it taking so long for me?

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

Posted on February 6, 2021,
Two major repair suggestions on March 12, 2021,
Returned for repair on April 12, 2021,
One minor repair suggestion on June 9, 2021,
Returned for repair on June 15, 2021,
Accepted on June 22, 2021.

(0) 讚！ | 天马

From submission to acceptance, a total of 9 months were taken, with the first review lasting 5 months, the second review lasting 3 months, and a major revision in between. The article was published online one month after acceptance.
There was one reviewer who provided very detailed comments, including 11 major comments, 11 figures in general, and 18 minor comments. Each of these comments needs to be carefully addressed.
2020.07.15 - Submitted to the journal
2020.12.19 - Major revision
2021.01.02 - Revision submitted to the journal
2021.01.05 - Under review
2021.04.10 - Accepted
2021.04.16 - Available online

(1) 讚！ | L^_^

It has been 7 months. Still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 小兔子

Submitted, outcome unknown.

(0) 讚！ | 小刘2021

Two months later, it was rejected and the two reviewers raised over 20 questions. The editor rejected it.

(0) 讚！ | XIAOQI

2020.02.20 Submission; 2020.03.23 Two review comments returned, which were all very good; 2020.03.30 Submitting the revised manuscript, during which it took three more days to find a company to polish the manuscript; 2020.04.02 Article acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | sajiasheng

reviewer invited 19 days?What kind of trouble is this?Is it that the reviewers do not review the draft during the World Cup?

(0) 讚！ | xz0003@surrey.ac.uk

will check the weight, remove the reference documents, the requirements are less than 30%, please be careful,

(0) 讚！ | 足矣