The review process is very slow, still under review. It took more than three months with modifications and additional experiments.

(0) 讚！ | 科研混子磊锅锅

9.10 submitted
9.19 with editor
9.19 rejected

The reason for rejection by the editor is just one sentence: "Unfortunately, we are not able to consider it further for publication in European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry." That's really all there is!

I want to say that the way a journal treats your manuscript is often reflected in how you treat them. The declining publication volume and impact factor of EurJIC are not without reason.

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔的豌豆

Hello, I would like to ask how long it will take to get the results approximately?

(0) 讚！ | tracer123

The efficiency is very high, and a reply will be given in about a month. Do not overly emphasize the impact factor. The fundamental purpose of publishing a paper is to contribute something to human society with one's own achievements.

(0) 讚！ | 火小邪

It has been over two months, and it has been in the reviewing status all along. What should I do? I can't graduate, I'm so worried.

(0) 讚！ | 清风即可

The submission made last Friday is still in the submission status on Monday. It has not reached the hands of the editor yet, which is really slow.

(0) 讚！ | 清风即可

Submission Date: 2021.9.21
Rejection Date: 2021.9.23

(0) 讚！ | 小木

The journal's review speed is extremely fast, and the reviewers' questions are very professional. Moreover, the authors are allowed to discuss with the reviewers. The manuscript was submitted on July 2nd, and received revision comments on July 26th (a total of 14 points). It was revised on August 9th and received formatting suggestions and basic acceptance from the editor on August 17th. It was revised on August 23rd and finally accepted on August 25th.

(4) 讚！ | 小飞12138

I researched two, also selectd CCC, then the editor refused, suggest this journal, but still want to punch the second district

(0) 讚！ | A

2 weeks to get comments. Both reviewers gave very positive comments.

(1) 讚！ | 1026382877@qq.com

Soon basically one month to accept

(1) 讚！ | 123

5 month 25 select has been submitted

(1) 讚！ | 123

5 month 27 select has been submitted

(0) 讚！ | 123

Two overhaul results were rejected

(0) 讚！ | fangfang

junk Journal

(0) 讚！ | jkj

The journal is very efficient, the editor is very responsible, two reviewers,44 days back to the comments, repaired four days later, received directly in the evening.Feeling very good, the article has new ideas and effects is still very easy

(0) 讚！ | 1258107317@qq.com

submitted on July 10th, received a rejection letter today, the reviewer's question is very professional, I feel that if the article is not new enough, it is difficult!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has been submitted after the submission, after receiving the message reject~~~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Why is my review status still "submitted"?The draft submitted on May 3rd is today on the 17th. Haven't you yet submitted it to the editor?

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

4 Submitted on the 25th of the month, May 17 was rejected

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is difficult, what is the submission requirement?Is it demanding innovation?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

After the overhaul, the cycle is fast. After receiving the edit message, you need to write a reply to inform the message.Other journals did not seem to find this.The review speed is fast.The overall feeling, you take the article seriously, the article will treat you seriously.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has selectd for two articles, all of which are major revisions, and one refuses to receive one.The review is no more than one month, and no reviewers are recommended.This journal is faster, a little suggestion: If three people review the manuscript, one of them refuses to answer the reviewer's opinion after careful consideration, especially the person who refuses is the chief judge.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The manuscript of the 11th month of the month, there was news on February 9th, the three reviewers were received after the minor repair, and they were repaired one week later, and they sent a message on the evening to receive it.It feels very efficient, and the reviewers ask questions that are also minor issues.Overall, it feels very easy.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has selectd twice for EJIC, both of which are reviewers.For the first time: one reviewer suggested to publish, no objection, and the other said that there was no innovation, edit the manuscript.The second time: both reviewers recommended the draft and edit the manuscript.Although he was rejected but convinced, his research work was not done well.I feel that the journal is very good. My article in this direction may be only a little worse than JPCC.Now I have an article on hand to go to a journal of RSC, and if I am rejected, I will select for this journal.Repeatedly selectd repeatedly, repeatedly according to repeated submitment.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名