Is over ten thousand the total number since the publication?

(0) 讚！ | Hubery Ackermann

Rejection after 4 months of the first review by 4 reviewers, I feel there is a significant bias against Chinese authors in their reviews

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃静逸

Got rejected

(0) 讚！ | 碧水承望

How did it go?

(0) 讚！ | 北国爱宝

How is the result now?

(0) 讚！ | 霹雳温茂

Priority should be given to the authors of the references in your submitted paper; avoid potential conflicts of interest

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Request recommendations from supervisors or relevant personnel of the subject

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Can I recommend someone I don't know as an expert?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

What should be paid attention to when recommending peer review?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

I have encountered this situation too... I don't know how long I have to wait

(0) 讚！ | 碧水承望

How long ago did you receive the publication?

(0) 讚！ | 风陵辛酉

How long does it take from receiving to publication?

(0) 讚！ | 北风梓璐

What about you? My decision is also in process for several days, and there has been no progress

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

Second, third, fourth rounds?

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Research focus: Aortic wall hematoma
Experience sharing: The first review took 2.5 months, while the second, third, and fourth reviews each took 3 weeks, indicating a relatively slow review speed. There were a total of 4 reviewers, including 3 clinical experts and 1 statistics expert, and their feedback was very professional

(0) 讚！ | 南风祖溢

Under review, the manuscript number is over 10,000

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

4.19 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

4.18 resubmitted with format revised again

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

4.15 resubmitted

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

#Experience# 4.11 manuscript submitted

(0) 讚！ | 东京茂典

Could you please let me know how long it takes for the status of "decision in process" to change to "with editor"? Mine has been in "decision in process" status for ten days with no updates

(0) 讚！ | 中原建树

The decision is in process and has now changed to "with editor." It has been over ten days and there is still no update. Has anyone else experienced this status before?

(0) 讚！ | 玄虚柔丽

Most European and American journals are somewhat discriminatory against China. Hmm

(0) 讚！ | 魔都江浩

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: I submitted a clinical article at the end of December, with the first review taking 40 days, delayed a few days due to Christmas. In the end, it was rejected and not allowed to be transferred to its sub-journal, indicating that there may be significant flaws in our article. However, the opinions of the three reviewers are not satisfactory. Two reviewers mentioned that incomplete baseline data may affect the results, but we have already adjusted for this using statistical methods. It makes one doubt whether the reviewers conducted a serious review, as it is not due to our language proficiency, as one reviewer stated that it was "well written." The comments from the last reviewer were even more questionable. It seems that the reviewers are somewhat irresponsible, purely based on personal feelings

(0) 讚！ | 应龙文勇

25.01.2019 Accept after revision - V2+ 
22.01.2019 Author Submits Revision Confirmation 
22.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
22.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
21.01.2019 Send for minor revision - V1 
09.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
09.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
09.01.2019 Author Notice - Technical Check failure 
08.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
08.01.2019 Author Notice - Technical Check failure 
07.01.2019 Author Submits Revision Confirmation 
07.01.2019 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
13.12.2018 Send for major revision - V1 
28.10.2018 Author Submits New Manuscript Confirmation 
28.10.2018 PDF Built and Requires Approval 
28.10.2018 PDF Built and Requires Approval

(0) 讚！ | 雾都凯康