How can we compare with the Big Four? They only have a few articles in a year, while we have nearly 500 in just one year.

(0) 讚！ | 流体物理小兵张嘎

The number of articles has doubled, and the quality has declined. Some parallel promotion work has also been carried out.

(58) 讚！ | bioer

In recent years, I have received too many papers, and the quality has declined significantly. Some of them are also imitative works.

(19) 讚！ | 流体物理小兵张嘎

The second-tier journal in the field of mathematics! Graduation can take off with just one article~

(11) 讚！ | WXfrac

Although the quality is unstable in some directions, it is still the second top journal in general. I personally think the average quality is similar to that of Compositio Mathematica and Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, but slightly lower than Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle's Journal).

(9) 讚！ | M.Z.

It was the top journal in the past, and is not inferior to Ann. Sci. 'Ec. Norm. Supér. (4). The quality now is far worse than before, but it is a litter better than Composi and Selecta. Personal opinion: The article on the dynamic system is fine, but the variance is large. The average level of articles on power systems is worse than that of CMP.

(12) 讚！ | 数学从业者

Personally think that this journal is a journal with a lot of mathematics. It is a big cow that can often send articles on it.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

is a very good journal.However, the quality of journals has declined in recent years, which may be related to some scholars resisting Elsevier journals.

(0) 讚！ | HSL

... Is this not a TOP journal?The Chinese Academy of Sciences has a problem?

(1) 讚！ | TT

is a very cattle journal!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Niu Journal, First Class. Struggle Goal

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The ease of publishing in this journal completely depends on the impact of your research. The submission process will be streamlined if your article is innovative – not so much for the opposite. There are many distinguished scientists that are editors for this journal, and most are well-established and active in their research fields. As a result, the reviewers are often experts in the field and generally very familiar with the research that is submitted. Even if you submit an article and it doesn’t get accepted, at least there’s the benefit of receiving guidance and critiques from the well-established scientists.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I heard that there is discrimination against China

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Niubi Journal, first-class, although the impact factor is not very high

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

牛Forced journals, first-class

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Niubi Journal, first-class

(1) 讚！ | 匿名