I regretted submitting the manuscript for review, it has only been under review for 8 days and it has already turned into "under review". Today, I received a message saying that they couldn't find enough reviewers to review the manuscript, I am worried that this will delay my submission process. I am speechless.

(0) 讚！ | 咸菜36

Brothers, this journal is so slow, if you're in a hurry, please don't choose this journal. They only send reminders once a week for articles submitted between the 12th and 20th of the month. It makes me angry to see this. After the editor finds a reviewer for your article, you often have to wait for the reviewer to return with feedback. You can't rush them. Remember, reviewers provide their services for free, so you can't expect the editor to push them. It's frustrating, isn't it?

(0) 讚！ | 小小小小小林

About ten days or so.

(0) 讚！ | 咸菜36

The submission by the expert will be reviewed a few days later.

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗狗.

It will take a few days for the submission from the expert to be reviewed.

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗狗.

30 reviewers were invited, opinions from three reviewers were received, and over 20 pages of responses were provided.

(0) 讚！ | Menethil Corn

In the first round, three reviewers were selected for major revisions, with only 14 days given. Surprisingly, the revised manuscript was accepted quickly, which was unexpected as it usually takes at least six to seven months. The manuscript did not have to go through another round of review, thanks to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Menethil Corn

"Under review for 8 days turned into a dip, I don't know what's going on, the system shows that no one has accepted the manuscript for review yet."

(0) 讚！ | 咸菜36

With editor for one month.

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗狗.

It used to take our senior fellow almost half a year to revise his submissions, but this year, he was asked for revisions just one month after submitting. The feedback was quite strict, and it took him two months to make the revisions. The submission has been accepted now.

(0) 讚！ | 农业智能

From August 1st to August 12th, this is quite fast, why the rush?

(0) 讚！ | jacsonlll

I have been waiting for 8 months since the first review in January, and the reviewer has completed the review. I have reminded three times, but still no response.

(0) 讚！ | Lyuuu

I couldn't help but urge again, but in the end, I was rejected and told directly that it wouldn't waste your time.

(0) 讚！ | 罗齐天大圣

There has been no reviewer for my manuscript for half a month, so it has been rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 顾清让

July 27 Editor re-invited reviewers
July 28 Third reviewer completed with a few references added. The first reviewer had no further comments. Editor requested major revisions.
July 31 Returned
Aug 2 Minor revisions requested, including adding a graphical abstract
Aug 2 Returned the same day
Aug 3 Received acceptance notice in the early morning
First article in Zone 1 top! Celebrate with flowers! Hopefully the future path of research will be smoother! Sincere thanks to the reviewers and editors for their hard work!

(1) 讚！ | 暗里着迷

Submitted on August 1st
Reviewed on August 4th, invited 5 reviewers, all agreed, sent more emails to invite more reviewers
Invited 5 more reviewers on August 8th, now have a total of 11 reviewers
As of August 12th, all have accepted to review the manuscript, can't push them anymore
Don't know what kind of people the journal invited, why they all don't accept to review, making the process very long, helplessly waiting.

(0) 讚！ | 罗齐天大圣

In the field of agronomy, it has been a top-tier journal for many years, with a well-controlled publication volume and high industry recognition. In terms of efficiency, it is average, with feedback from two reviewers received within two months. However, the quality of the feedback may be considered mediocre. The Impact Factor of EJA has been on a downward trend, and if not addressed, it may follow the fate of "plant and soil" and drop to a lower tier, making it difficult to recover. Currently, around one-fourth of the submissions to EJA are from China, and if it drops to a lower tier, it may be irreversible.

(3) 讚！ | 欺言乐翁

Excuse me, it has been 10 days since I submitted my article, but the system shows that the editor has not processed it yet. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 昆仑农夫

Did you reject it directly?

(0) 讚！ | 喜马拉雅一条龙

I hope everyone can share their progress after the first review.

(0) 讚！ | 暗里着迷

Submission on May 27, review after a week
June 14 Major revisions (two reviewers, relatively good feedback)
June 30 Revisions submitted
July 3 First reviewer completes review
July 11 Second reviewer still hasn't accepted the review.....
The first review took a little over a week and was very efficient. Now I am worried that the second review will take too long. I want to apply for a scholarship. I wonder if the second review will be slow.

(0) 讚！ | 暗里着迷

Both are dips, no movement for a week, just hanging there.

(0) 讚！ | aijiaaiu

How long does it take for the dip to harden? It will harden as long as it is continuously suspended.

(0) 讚！ | aijiaaiu

Hello, is it normal for the submission to journal status to remain "submitted to journal" five days after submission?

(0) 讚！ | Zhangjubw

Hello, may I ask if this journal will review the submission directly or reject it? It has been 5 days since I submitted my paper and it still shows as "submitted to journal" without "with editor"

(0) 讚！ | Zhangjubw