Yes, it has been four months since the external audit, and I have sent reminder emails to both the system and the mailbox in the past week, but have not received any response.

(0) 讚！ | 野指针

Hello, may I ask if your current submission status is as follows: EIC: Editorial Office, ETRI Journal ADM: Editorial Office, ETRI Journal ADM: Editage, English Editor Under Review?

(0) 讚！ | G___

Hello, I have been waiting for three months for my submission to be reviewed. The status is currently "Under Review." Can you confirm if it has been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | G___

20240423 submitted
20240504 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 野指针

Submission: 24-Oct-2023; revised 17-Dec-2023; accepted 08-Jan-2024; the process was quite fast

(0) 讚！ | Yyu

Close to 3 months of review, 2 minor repairs.A week of revision, the first trial is about 10 days, received, a total of 3 and a half months.The speed is still relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 568062616

manuscript to use word editing, first by themselves to review it, and then find an expert to send an external audit.In addition, the file name of the submitted manuscript should not be too long, otherwise they will have problems downloading and opening ~~~ The submission has been almost 4 months. Two months ago, I returned to a minor repair +1 overhaul. I should still wait for the advice of the third expert.Know how it will be ~~~~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review is fast.Without big innovation, it is generally tragedy.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The drafter presupposes 3 people, and the 1-2 review comments on the homepage are sometimes enough to give conclusions, which may depend on the editor, my regular paper reviewI gave advice for 15 months and 1 month. There are only two reviewers, one major, one minor, which is being revised.The reviewer can indeed read the content of the article and propose a more neutral review.The overall feeling is much faster than expected, and the general letter is more common for one and a half months.Attached to the specific review time node, for the reference of the insect friends: July 16th submission of regular paper, August 25 first trial return, 1 minor revision, 1 major revisio

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2 reviewers. 3 month review. Numerous special issues.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

At the time, this was my first SCI. There are two reasons for it. The first is that it does not collect money, and the second is that it feels like it is at its own level.That kind of.The review time was particularly long, and I was almost a year old.It was a major repair in the month of April, when it was returned in January of the second year.After making a lot of experiments, I changed it for two months.Then, after nearly three months of trial, accept it directly.It has been published in October.In other words, it took 18 months to complete from submission to publication.I don't know if the reviewers recommended at the time were relatively bullish. The self-recommended reviewers at that time were all big bulls in the field. No way, no one knows, or secretly submitted the manuscript, hehe.The result of recommending the cow is the special ambiguity of the review comments. Each one is

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

. I have recently selectd once. They seem to have not sent the external trial first, and the editorial committee has tried it.This is also mentioned in front of the direct editor of the editor, it seems to be true.In the past two weeks, the editorial board gave a rejection, but the reason was very nonsense. I did not focus on the focus of the article, and then said that it was too vague.I mainly reveal a phenomenon through physical mechanism research, and then mention the solution to the solution (currently not achievable).The editor of this journal is too subjective and does not understand my things at all. The opinions given are not in place.It may also be that my stuff is not suitable for this publication.It is best for everyone to have articles with improved algorithms and improved performance. Like Chinese publications, they like this result.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

definitely gives results in three months, I selectd for 2 or two letters.The first two reviewers gave a minor repair, and they refused after the revision.The second part has three reviewers, two minor repairs, one overhaul, and received directly after the revision.I feel that I have not sent a reviewer to review it after the revision. It is the editor’s decision.Children's shoes that are in urgent need of an article can be submitted.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The letter of the select, the review is very fast, the first month of the trial, the two opinions are minor revision, 15 days to modify the reception, relatively lucky.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

selectdLetter, a major repair, a minor repair, do not know the result now

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I put a Letter in July, reviewed for more than 1 month, online can see the progress, this is a good ~~~The draft is very fast, and the editor is also quite responsible. Unfortunately, the reviewers who are involved are more savvy, both of which are Major Revisions, edited by Reject, and recommended to re-attend.After a month, I overhauled the heavy submitment, hoping to have a good result earlier~~~Understand the situation of other people submitting the manuscript, which is generally difficult, because the amount of manuscript is relatively large, it is said that there are generally only two trials.The manuscript is a Minor Revision and there may be a chance to change ~~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Korean journals are more formal, the review period is fast (can be guaranteed within three months), and two journals are mailed after the accept and30 copies of a single book.It is more difficult to accept.If there is not a big innovation, but only in the previous theoretical changes, it will generally be drafted.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名