How are things going now? How long with the editor? It's been almost two months with the editor on my end, and I've contacted them in the middle, they said they are still reviewing it, waiting is making me anxious.

(0) 讚！ | Michi1

The editors and reviewers work quickly, and the journal, which accepts minor revisions, should have decent quality. It might be worth considering submitting your work on human-computer interaction to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | LEE vito

Four months have passed, and the day before Christmas Eve, my submission was rejected in the first round of review, citing that there were too many pending manuscripts and others more suitable than me. They said I was too dark and humorous

(0) 讚！ | 清一色自摸三家

The submission to the journal was reviewed for a month, then by the editors for another half month. The external review process took nearly four months, only to receive a rejection in the end. The reviewer's comments spanned three pages, with a high level of scrutiny on the research details and references

(1) 讚！ | tuoni

Contacted the journal twice, was told the editor is reviewing it, but the status still hasn't changed. It's been over two months

(0) 讚！ | 薄小盒子

Replied, already forwarded to the editor

(0) 讚！ | 清一色自摸三家

Can I ask if the administrator has replied, saying that it has been forwarded to the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 薄小盒子

Still in this state, I emailed the editor asking if everything was normal

(0) 讚！ | 清一色自摸三家

Submitted on August 29th, still waiting to hear back from the journal administrator. I wonder how much longer it will take

(0) 讚！ | 薄小盒子

How are you doing, I have been in this state for almost 50 days too

(0) 讚！ | 薄小盒子

It's really slow because it has been 35 days with the Journal Administrator, just like the one above. I don't know how much longer I have to wait, so I'll leave a comment

(0) 讚！ | 清一色自摸三家

"After 35 days of submission, it was in the 'With Journal Administrator' status, which was strange. Then, it was in the 'With Editor' status for 7 days, followed by 'Out for Review' for 15 days. After that, it was in the 'Decision Pending' status for 3 days. Ultimately, it was rejected. The three reviewers provided diverse opinions, ranging from experimental design to data analysis and writing. Although there were some areas of disagreement, most of the opinions pointed out weaknesses that I also believed were forced."

(0) 讚！ | Jue0531

Does the system display the correct submission progress, may I ask? I have been with the journal administrator for over a month, and when I emailed them, they said there was no problem. Just today, it has been a month and a half since it was transferred to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Jue0531

May I ask how long have you been conducting the second review and external audit?

(0) 讚！ | 本无意放引燃

Upgrade version of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone 2 journal
The first review takes 2 months, the second review takes 1 month, and the results are notified within 3 days after receiving the second review comments.
The modification process is not easy, but the editorial work is very fast.

(13) 讚！ | 碧天长虹

The only three-star journal of AJG in man-machine engineering, an authoritative journal in the field, the review speed was very fast. If it is not suitable, the results will be released in about 10 days (I have submitted an article that was directly rejected by the editor around 10 days later, and then I know that several submissions were also rejected within 10 days). The following submission experience is for your reference: 1. The editor required to polish language 1 week after submission. 2. The manuscript was resubmitted half a month later, and it was under review a week later. 3. Major revision was required 3 months later (2 reviewers, more than 30 comments), and I was given half a year for revision. 4. The revised manuscript was returned one and a half months later. 5. Minor revision was required 40 days later. 6. The revised manuscript was returned one week later and accepted 3 days later.

(5) 讚！ | emiledy

Medium ranking.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous