Hello, has the status of your paper been updated?

(0) 讚！ | 桃花不换酒1234

10.29 All reviewer reports received

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

Mainly low impact factors

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

Not yet, still under review

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

How are you now? Did you receive it?

(0) 讚！ | 聪聪Belle

9.25 Out to reviewers
9.25 1st reviewer agreed to report

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

My submission just shows "awaiting referee reports", has the submission system been updated? It's different from the previous status

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

Just submitted for an hour and already showing Awaiting Referee Reports. I feel like the editor hasn't been assigned yet and they are probably checking if my submission meets the standards

(0) 讚！ | 当且仅当d

Why is the status of my paper different from everyone else's? It only says "Awaiting Referee Reports".

(0) 讚！ | dingdang001

Good journals in this field are at least stronger than the Zone 3 journals commonly seen by me, such as Elsevier. They contain a lot of excellent and original work by prestigious researchers, with high h-index and good reputation. However, they are not considered as top-tier journals and are classified as Zone 4.

(0) 讚！ | BigMelon

The upgraded version unexpectedly dropped to the 4th zone, which is outrageous. There are many excellent articles inside, with a high h-index. The reputation within this field is even higher than that of the journals in the 3rd zone.

(99) 讚！ | BigMelon

A very good high-level journal in mathematical physics, it is fast and of high quality, and the peer-review comments are professional and profound!

(22) 讚！ | 纳维

02 Apr 2020 Sources files requested; 06 Apr 2020 The Editorial Office received the Manuscript; 06 Apr 2020 The Co-editor received the Manuscript; 15 Apr 2020 Manuscript sent to Referee 1; 15 Apr 2020 Manuscript sent to Referee 2; 16 Apr 2020 Referee 1 could not report; 16 Apr 2020 Manuscript sent to Referee 3; 22 Apr 2020 Reminded Referee 3; 22 Apr 2020 Reminded Referee 2; 29 Apr 2020 2nd reminder to Referee 2; 30 Apr 2020 2nd reminder to Referee 3.

(1) 讚！ | LiZi2012

26 Feb 2019 Manuscript sent to Referee; 01 Mar 2019 Referee could not report; 05 Mar 2019 Reminded Referee; 05 Mar 2019 Referee promised a review; 01 Apr 2019 Reminded Referee who promised; 08 Apr 2019 Reminded Referee who promised; 08 Apr 2019 Referee promised a review; 12 Apr 2019 Referee sent a report; 16 Apr 2019 Message to author asking for revision.

(2) 讚！ | 火光

It is highly recommended not to choose China Co-editor, my first foreign Co-editor, the second Co-editor will be replaced the next day, but this Chinese Co-The editor has not been processed for ten days, and he chose to shoot his head at that time, regret it

(0) 讚！ | adda

2017-10-06[10] file sent to printer2017-10-05[20] pdf offprint sent to author2017-10-05[31] online first ready for publication2017-10-05[25] paper ready2017-10-05[38] internal editing phase 32017-10-02[38] internal editing phase 32017-09-26[33] started internal editing phase 22017-09-21[09] proofs back from author2017-09-21[08]proofs received by author2017-09-20[34] sent notice of ready proofs

(1) 讚！ | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

European service is a bit stiff. When submitting a manuscript, go to the official website for a template. It is quite troublesome to change. It is also very troublesome when proofing, or it is very original proof..The speed of review is very fast. It mainly depends on whether you can find a suitable reviewer. The level of manuscript is general, the direction is too complicated, and the situation is uneven. There are both high-level articles and big love articles of Audrey. There are APL on the PLA.CPL,

(0) 讚！ | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

31 Jul 2017 Reminded Referee307 Aug 2017 Referee3 sent a report08 Aug 2017 Message to author asking for revision18 Aug 2017 The revised manuscript arrived to the Editorial Office18 Aug 2017 Revised ms was sent to the Co-editor29 Aug 2017 Manuscript Accepted30 Aug 2017 Copyright Form received

(0) 讚！ | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Three reviewers. Still waiting.

(0) 讚！ | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

This journal is really awesome, the first paper received it, the only bad thing is that the journal's influence factor is a bit low, 1.957.

(3) 讚！ | Anonymous

The optical editor of this journal is very small, and he selectd for one. He was refused to say the same day, and he also blocked the manuscript of the manuscript.It is because of implicit criticism of his academic views.

(5) 讚！ | epl

There was an article on January 3, 2016, and I hope to be able to submit it for review...On January 7th, co-editor is Christian Beck, asking for a big trial.On January 31st, it was rejected, one was revised, and one said no new ideas!On February 1st, the editor replied and agreed to re-submit the revised draft and return to the two reviewers.On February 23rd, the reissue was revised...

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

EPL, which was selectd in early August, the editor found two reviewers.The reviewers' opinions were more positive and several suggestions for revision were made.After the revision, the reviewer second trial and finally received.What I am doing is the direction of photoelectric detection.EPL is also interested in papers on engineering direction.06 Aug 2013 Manuscript received by Editorial Office06 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Co-editor19 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee119 Aug 2013

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

What is the situation?When will there be results?Looking forward to...20 Aug 2013 Manuscript received by Editorial Office20 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Co-editor26 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee126 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee226 Aug 2013 Referee1 promised ar

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

is really fast, usually a reviewer.But it seems that the big class fell to the 3rd district http://if.easysci.com/2012/bigclass/wuli.html

(0) 讚！ | 匿名