The new system still shows "Under Review" as of 8/27. It feels like nothing has changed.

(0) 讚！ | Edioto

May I ask if the article you submitted is a basic research or a clinical research article?

(0) 讚！ | 神经肌肉

After we submitted the article, it immediately showed as "Under Review"? The status is not reliable at all.
8/27 The new system still shows "Under Review". It seems like nothing has changed.
9/4 The system has been updated, now it says "in revision".

(0) 讚！ | Edioto

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 5.0
Experience Sharing: I sent an email to the editor first, and on the third day, I received a direct rejection reply, the speed is indeed very fast

(0) 讚！ | Joyce Brown

Generally, the experiments are arranged in the order of appearance of the results

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Important literature can be used if available, but should highlight the emphasis of both

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is the important literature in the results or described in the introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

What is the writing order/logical order of methods?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

The review process takes about a month, but after making revisions, the review is completed quickly, within two weeks. Then, within another two weeks, it is published.

(0) 讚！ | Tinytiger

Seeking for experiences and sharing

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: I tried to submit last year and was rejected within 2 weeks, but they also provided feedback, which was very efficient

(0) 讚！ | 烈焰竹雨

Passing the 5-point threshold is a cause for celebration. Next year, aiming to reach the next level. If passing the 6-point threshold, it will be even more remarkable

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review process is quite fast

(0) 讚！ | 通幽爱巧

Experience: Retrospective clinical studies do not require registration numbers. Only RCTs are mandatory, and for prospective clinical studies, registration is recommended

(0) 讚！ | 振永酱大魔王

Experience: For retrospective clinical studies, no registration number required. Recommend registering RCTs in advance.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Do retrospective studies need a clinical trial registration number? bingojean   2014-09-13 Post:: Research direction: epilepsy;; acceptance rate: about 25% Review time: about 1 month This journal is very efficient. The responsible editor was assigned on the first day, and an assistant editor was assigned on the second day. However, the manuscript was rejected by the assistant editor on the second day... The level of the assistant editor is similar to that of the expert reviewer. I later found out that this assistant editor has independently or collaboratively published 66 sci articles, with 18 articles in this journal, one of which is about guidelines in my research area. The decision letter was very tactful, saying that the journal is highly competitive with an acceptance rate of only 25%, without providing any suggestions. I had to ask my assistant editor later, who then gave some advice, saying that the main problems were the unclear research objectives, lack of clarity in the discussion, missing citations, and advised me to carefully read the guidelines he wrote. Now I am preparing to revise and submit to j neurology, hoping for a little hope from the heavens~~~

(0) 讚！ | 奇邃姑娘

Getting ready to submit, but the accuracy rate is not high!

(0) 讚！ | 奇邃姑娘

Retrospective clinical studies do not require registration numbers. Only RCTs are mandatory, for prospective clinical studies, registration is recommended

(0) 讚！ | 中原兴思

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: This journal is very efficient. I was assigned a responsible editor on the first day, an assistant editor on the second day, and rejected by the assistant editor on the third day. The level of the assistant editor is similar to that of the review expert. I later checked and found that this assistant editor has published a total of 66 sci articles either by themselves or in collaboration with others, with 18 in their own journal, one of which is guidelines in my research direction. The decision letter was very tactful, stating that the competition for the journal is fierce and the acceptance rate is only 25%, without providing any specific feedback. I later asked my assistant editor for some advice, and was told that the main problems were unclear research objectives, lack of clear discussion, lack of literature citations, and to take a closer look at the guidelines they wrote. I am now preparing to revise and resubmit to J Neurology, hoping for a bit of hope from above

(0) 讚！ | 稻妻思萱

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Relatively difficult to hit

(0) 讚！ | 天神院雨雪