The emphasis should be on including as much preliminary research work as possible, with no limit on the number of papers

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

There is generally no limit on the number of words, but it should be kept to a certain proportion

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many references are generally cited in an introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

How many words should usually be written in the introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Submit a one-month overhaul and expect it to be returned after 5 weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 瓜丝儿

Hello, does this journal require recommended reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 我真是个小天才

Submitted on January 31, minor revisions on March 22, major revisions on March 29, accepted on March 31. It took two months, the feedback was quite constructive, and the editor was efficient

(0) 讚！ | 五郎梓奥

The speed is OK, the opinions are pertinent, and it is considered a professional journal in the field of enzyme engineering. Oct 10, submitted to journal; Oct 11, with editor; Oct 30, Under Review; Nov 16, Minor Review; Dec 11, Revision submitted to journal; Dec 12, with editor; Dec 12 Under review; Dec 12, Accept.

(2) 讚！ | biocat

Speed is alright, the opinions are pertinent, this journal may be considered relatively professional in the field of enzyme engineering

(0) 讚！ | 明冠颖萓

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: When I submitted for the first time, they said there were too many submissions and rejected it directly. Then I submitted again on July 25th, got the result on September 16th for the second submission, major revision (1 month), no need for additional experiments. All three reviewers mentioned that the language needed polishing and some details needed attention. Revised on October 11th, received feedback on November 4th, made some detail modifications and got accepted on November 5th. Submitted the final version on November 5th and received the acceptance notification on November 6th

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄秀梅

In the first submission, it was rejected directly for there were too many manuscripts. And then I submitted it again. The second submission was on July 25, and the result was given on September 16, major revision was required (one month). There was no need to supplement the experiments. All of three reviewers said that the language should be polished, and some details should be noticed. The revision was submitted on October 11. The comments were made on November 4: It would be accepted after the revision of some details. It was submitted on November 5 after revision. The notice of acceptance was given on November 6.

(0) 讚！ | 良2333

I had published an article about error-prone PCR modification of enzymes in 2016 as a graduate student. IF in 2018 is 3.5. This is a journal highly recognized by the enzyme industry, and the citation rate is very low as 3%.

(0) 讚！ | tonycjlu

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: In 2016, a graduate student published a paper on enzyme-mediated PCR modification, which was well-received in the enzyme industry with an impact factor of 3.5 in a reputable journal. The self-citation rate is very low, at 3%

(0) 讚！ | Hyman Jefferson

No page charges. 177****5672Nickname unavailable 2018-04-18 Posted::SCI(2016):2.502 SCI(2015):2.624 SCI(2014):2.322 Just wondering, how much are the page charges for this journal? Thanks!

(0) 讚！ | 中原明智

Excuse me, may I ask how much is the page charge for this journal? Thank you! tonycjlu 2016-02-09 16:42:00 post: Just got an article accepted as a graduate student, it's about directional evolution. I don't know why the impact factor has decreased so much. I suggest carefully reading the content on the journal's website before submitting. They have their preferred topics for publication and areas that are difficult to be accepted. Of course, the language needs to be well edited and polished. The level of most reviewers is still very high. Very impartial. In short, it is the choice for researchers in enzyme studies

(0) 讚！ | Elijah Emmie

The first instance took quite a long time, with the result announced after 3 months; the second instance only took around a month, and was accepted about half a month after the revisions were made

(0) 讚！ | Beverly Yule

The first trial was slower and took 3 months to get results; the second trial took a month, and it took about half a month to accept it.

(0) 讚！ | alarace

Keep falling, will it break 2 in the end? It has dropped a lot in just one year, even if it's just 0.1 point, it should still be cherished

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing experience: Just had an article accepted recently on directional evolution as a graduate student. However, I'm not sure why the impact factor dropped so dramatically. I suggest carefully reading the content on the journal's website before submitting, as it outlines their preferred topics and areas that are not easily accepted. Of course, language should be carefully edited and polished, as most reviewers are highly skilled and objective. In summary, it's a choice for enzyme researchers

(0) 讚！ | 中原明智

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: I recently had an article accepted, but the review process took a long time. It took one month and 27 days to receive the results, which required major revisions. I made the revisions as requested and the article was accepted one week later. The format had to strictly adhere to the requirements of the journal, or else it would be rejected for not meeting formatting standards. The article focused on site-directed mutagenesis of enzymes, which this journal tends to favor in enzyme-related articles

(0) 讚！ | 通幽幼旋

2014-9-15Submission, 11-4 first-instance opinion, minor repair, 11-8 rework, 1-14 reception.

(0) 讚！ | Yang

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted on 9/15/2014, received first round of comments on 11/4, made minor revisions on 11/8, and accepted on 1/14

(0) 讚！ | 法慧才良

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Mar 18, 2013 submitted to the journal
Mar 19, 2013 submissions sent back to author
Apr 12, 2013 technical check in progress
Apr 15, 2013 with editor
Apr 16, 2013 completed - reject

(0) 讚！ | 震雷文瑾

Mar 18, 2013 submitted to the journalMar 19, 2013 Submissions Sent Back to AuthorApr 12, 2013 Technical Check in ProgressApr 15, 2013 WithEditorApr 16, 2013 Completed - Reject

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: The speed is relatively fast, with acceptance given in two months, with two or three language revisions in between. High language requirements are needed, and it is recommended to carefully edit the language to save time. Innovation is required, and the research content is not limited to enzymes. What I researched has nothing to do with enzymes, and the workload is not large, but it is highly innovative and was accepted. The review process is very fast, with feedback given in one to two weeks almost every time

(0) 讚！ | Rosemary Tom