How is the progress going so far?

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼干emo

I want to know, how is the progress going now?

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼干emo

It has been half a month and it still hasn't been processed

(71) 讚！ | cugGIS

I have been waiting for more than 10 days and it is still submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | 红扑扑

Is there a fixed template for this journal? Can someone please share it?

(0) 讚！ | JustinLo

The journal level is not to be underestimated. Over 10 years ago, the impact factor was already 4+. The articles are all based on solid work and have software availability. The downside is the slow review speed, and in recent years, there has been a serious inflation in academic journal impact factors. Surprisingly, the impact factor has been stagnant. This is probably related to the fact that the journal has not yet been dominated by domestic peers. However, overall, environmental modeling and GIS circles are still highly recognized internationally

(0) 讚！ | zhenbh

May 25, 2023 Submission
Nov 11, 2023 Review comments returned. Major revisions required. Requested to resubmit in 21 days.
Nov 28, 2023 Resubmission
Dec 01, 2023 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Pluto

23.6.12 submitted
23.6.13 with editor
23.6.28 under review
23.7.15 Required Reviews Completed
23.8.11 Received comments, revise by 31st
23.8.25 Revised, with editor
23.8.30 Decision in Process
23.9.5 accept

(0) 讚！ | 榕弥

Update: After submitting on 6.22, the review comments will be returned after two months (moderate). After making modifications, the second review will provide minor changes. Finally, it was accepted on 11.21.

(0) 讚！ | stratapan

The submission made in June was given moderate revisions during the first review, and minor revisions during the second review. The revised manuscript was submitted on November 1st, but it is still with the editor after two weeks. The processing of the manuscript by the editor is indeed a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | stratapan

Posted on February 17, 2022;
Returned for major revisions on April 20, 2022, with a generally indifferent attitude from the reviewer;
Returned on May 20, 2022;
Received minor revision comments on June 3, 2022;
Returned on June 11, 2022;
Accepted on June 24, 2022;
Mainly due to the editor's interest in the content, the editor's attitude was quite good.

(0) 讚！ | liummm

The submission made on June 23rd is still pending for the magazine... Isn't it a bit too slow?

(0) 讚！ | 请针对山葉

Share the submission timelines with you: 20-Dec-2019, submitted; 06-Aug-202: major revision; 18-Oct-2020: minor revision; 13-Dec-2020: accept. It is quite fast for the late stages. The slowness was mainly due to the impact of the epidemic. It is still a relatively recognized journal.

(8) 讚！ | 阿战

A flagship journal in the field of environmental modeling. Although the impact factor is somewhat unstable, the overall standard is still very high. I submitted an article, and the review process was long and tortuous, with 6 urgings, but it was about only 40 days for the reviewers to review the manuscript! It was accepted after a major revision. The key review process was as follows, for reference: Submission: 2018-9-18; With Editor: 9-19; 9-26; Reviewer invited: 10-21 (status request at 10-16); Under review: 10-23; Ready for Decision: 12-3; Decision pending: 12-4; Major revision: 12-16; Resubmission: 2019-2-10 (status request at 3-7 and 3-25); Under review: 4-8; Ready for Decision: 7-24 (status request at 7-24); Decision pending: 8-20 (status request at 8-7); Accepted: 2019-9-24 (status request at 9-5).

(1) 讚！ | 飞天小猪ljzhu

I selectd for a few days and told me to change my English. After more than a month, I returned directly for two months.The speed of rejection is also slow enough, delay time, metamorphosis journal.

(1) 讚！ | hugo

After submitting the manuscript, there is no waiting in the future. It has been waiting for 5 months with the editor. I wrote two letters in the middle to ask, the first letter was not echoed, and the second letter was responsible for editing.The manuscript has forgotten that it has not been processed, and there is no apology.Then the reviewer was invited to submit the review, and waited for another 4 months, directly rejected.Since then, I will not select for this journal again

(1) 讚！ | osborn

The review period is too long, but the journal review is very strict and professional, and the editor is also very responsible. It is completely the level of a district. I don’t know why the impact factor is low

(2) 讚！ | SSE

The first review is longer, at least 3 months. The final review takes 100 days. High quality and authority in the field.

(2) 讚！ | Yaoxiaoqiu

3 months of preliminary review, but refused to select but encouraged to select again, overhaul, rework, review for 4 months, there is still a reviewer who does not accept, repair, and accept one month later.IF has dropped.5% hit rate.

(0) 讚！ | LG

article submitted for three months to the initial review opinion, was rejected, then informed that you can modify and then select again, modify one month to select again, 20 days out of the second instance, minor repair; modify 3 days to submit.I will accept it after 2 months.Overall, it is still relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 红箭

Two articles have been submitted and the experience has been reviewed twice. From submission to recruitment for about 10 months, another January is still under review as a non-environmental professional.Also quite lucky

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

selectd 2 articles, one under review, another with editor.Normal 3-4 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

On average three months to have a message

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submission 1 month and 1 week, the status has not changed, still not in the editor's hand, thisThe quality of the journal is not commented at the moment, and the speed is really crashing!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名