Reviewed one paper and submitted one paper myself.
Timeline for review: it took a little over a month from the author's submission to the invitation to review, less than 40 days. Acceptance of the review was confirmed within 2 working days, with a review time limit of 4 weeks, and the journal expects to return comments to the author within 5 weeks of each round. Perhaps the research direction being reviewed is quite popular, as there were seven reviewers in the end. The editor was quite friendly, although some of the review comments were sharp, but in the end it was still recommended for major revisions. From the email inviting me to review to the major revisions was basically five weeks, with a 60-day revision time. The second round of reviews has not yet been fully completed, so the results are still unknown.

Timeline for submission:
20240410 submitted, ADM processing
20240427 Formatting and other checks completed, looking for AE
20240514 External review started, Reviewers Score

(0) 讚！ | 野指针

2023.9.23 Submission
2024.5.12 Revision
2024.5.19 Acceptance

Please be cautious with urgent submissions as processing may be slow

(0) 讚！ | ACLuke

The initial review process was very slow, it was the slowest journal I have ever submitted to. If you are in a hurry, I do not recommend submitting to this journal. I submitted in February 2023, received minor revisions in October, and was accepted at the end of January 2024. It was first published online in early March 2024

(0) 讚！ | zwx520

It has been over 8 months since the submission... Still no response

(0) 讚！ | onionfish

The speed is unstable, it's been over 4 months and still no result, but there are people around me who got accepted in just over 2 months. Sigh

(0) 讚！ | Cherlas

Slow speed, a fair editor directly rejected

(0) 讚！ | Trans

Submission in February 2023, major revision in May, and acceptance in June

(0) 讚！ | limengran

Hello, may I ask if you, the expert, place the response at the beginning of the paper when submitting revisions?

(0) 讚！ | sylai

Do we need to put the response at the beginning of the paper when submitting revisions? I saw a specific button for uploading responses when I submitted, so I uploaded it, but the email mentioned putting the response at the beginning

(0) 讚！ | sylai

Oops, this journal is really slow now, almost 6 months, no response at all. It's not even a top-tier journal, why is it so slow?

(0) 讚！ | 麻中麻

How about the feedback? Two good and one fair.
For the fair one, I clicked reject. =_=!

(0) 讚！ | lepub测试工程师

Submitted in September, under review on the same day;
First round of review completed in December, major revision;
Second round of review completed in January, minor revision;
Accepted on the same day after revisions;
The first review took a bit long, 3 months, but the speed of revisions afterwards was very fast. The cost-effectiveness of the journal is very high, worth submitting to. Each reviewer's comments were very professional, and the handling speed of the editor-in-chief and associate editor was very fast, basically processed on the same day

(5) 讚！ | Rachard L

I have submitted two manuscripts to this journal, and the overall experience can only be described as very disappointing. The first submission took 12 months for the first review, with two reviewers: one giving a major revision suggestion and the other rejecting the manuscript. The editor rejected it directly. The second submission took 10 months for the first review, with the same review process and outcomes. To be honest, rejection is not a big deal as long as the reviewers provide valid criticisms and point out the shortcomings of the paper, which is acceptable to the authors. However, both rejections in this case were based on very generic feedback, lacking specificity and constructive suggestions, especially the second one, which felt more like a rejection for the sake of rejection, wasting the authors' valuable time. I used to be a dedicated reviewer for this journal, having reviewed nearly a hundred manuscripts in the past. I always provided detailed and constructive feedback in my reviews. After these two submission experiences, I have completely lost faith in this journal. Therefore, I have not reviewed any more manuscripts for them

(0) 讚！ | CrazySpider

Hello friend, my TCSS submission has been "Under Review" for over a month, does this mean it has not been sent for peer review? Thank you. Do we have to wait for reviewers' scores to begin the review process? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | EleaM Josen Haplacg

Wow~ You have two majors, while I have two minors and got rejected, one for major and one for the editor. Maybe as long as one of the opinions is a rejection, then it will be rejected. Very strict

(0) 讚！ | Mrs.lemon

This journal is interesting, but I don't want to reject people so obviously!
9.26 submission
11.14 reviewers score
12.8 ae recommends
12.14 reviewers score
12.15 reject
Reviewer comments: The first two major, the third reject.
Personal speculation: The editor received two reviewer comments, both major, but did not want to accept them. On 12.14, a third reviewer was quickly found and rejected in just one day. In the end, based on the third reviewer's comments, the rejection was given

(0) 讚！ | 匿名用户1

The peer review process of this journal is very strange. There were three reviewers in total, one minor revision acceptance, one major revision acceptance, and one rejection, with the final decision being rejection. The first two reviewers provided constructive comments from their respective professional perspectives, but the third reviewer was very odd, with no specific professional suggestions, only vague and grandiose generalizations, followed by a seemingly contradictory criticism. It feels very gpt. For example, "The method proposed in this paper for analyzing *** in the context of *** operations has positive implications, but it also faces some challenges. Some positive coping strategies are worth considering to address specific tasks." It's really confusing to read. I deeply reflect on it

(1) 讚！ | 电院小熊

May I ask in which stage we are now since the status "Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment" has been for over half a month?

(0) 讚！ | 虎皮青椒呀

This journal's requirements are too strict. Three reviewers, one asked for major revisions, one asked for minor revisions which were accepted, and one rejected it. In the end, it was rejected. The reviewer who rejected it didn't provide any suggestions on the model methods, just mentioned language and inadequate conclusion. It's really frustrating

(3) 讚！ | 茄子哦

Not interdisciplinary

(0) 讚！ | shayul

You can go to the IEEE Help Center, where they have a system for writing request letters. The staff there will reflect to the corresponding journal editor based on the journal and paper ID you submitted

(0) 讚！ | Mrs.lemon

Submitted in early June 2023; 
Received reminder in September. The associate editor informed five reviewers, with only one reviewer left to complete the review. However, a decision has been made. Finally, feedback from four reviewers was received – two minor revisions were accepted, one major revision and one rejection were received, with the latter being rejected by the associate editor. 
All three reviewers' comments were positive, but the last reviewer rejected the paper due to insufficient experiments. Feeling unsatisfied, a rebuttal with the chief editor was made, and a chance to resubmit was given. 
Completed revisions and resubmitted on October 18th, hoping for good news this time. 
P.S. It's best not to rush, as rushing may lead to tragedy

(0) 讚！ | Mrs.lemon

Where can I find the deputy editor's email for inquiries?

(0) 讚！ | Double_cc

Brother, is your AI in charge of interdisciplinary and sociological aspects, or is it purely based on AI methods?

(0) 讚！ | 早点接收啊啊啊