You can determine whether your manuscript matches by referring to the article types specified in the journal submission guidelines

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Whether the theme of the manuscript is suitable for the scope defined by the journal; the target audience of the journal; the peer review and publication cycle of the journal

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Are there any principles when selecting publications?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

Is there a correlation between the type of article and the selection for publication?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

My research direction is the quality analysis of traditional Chinese medicine, the method involved is UHPLC-MS/MS, and the first review lasted 20–25 days after submission, one reviewer recommended a revision, and the other rejected it. The second review lasted for 1 month. A new reviewer was recruited. After the revision, the manuscript was accepted. 15 days from revision to acceptance, together with the time in the editor's hands, was almost 3 months.

(0) 讚！ | 林毅

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: What does it mean when a manuscript goes under review immediately after submission to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵波峻

The article was under review immediately after the submission to this journal, what is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | wwwwwwww

Three districts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

(0) 讚！ | 西风曜坤

Isn't it a little off? Just entered a game. If it's a first person game, it won't be a problem. Haha

(0) 讚！ | Sebastian Nancy

Everything can only hope for next year, after all, as long as the overall trend is up, there is no need to worry. Even if it only rises a little bit in a year, accumulated over time, it is also good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The overall speed is especially strong, and the reviewers are very good.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

The overall speed is particularly impressive, and the reviewers are very good

(0) 讚！ | 虹雨mm

Falling year by year, it is worrying

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The upstairs neighbor indicated that in the review process, some journals will stay at the editorial office for a period of time, while others have a very quick turnaround

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

After submitting an article to this magazine, it immediately goes under review. What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

2013.7.4 submitted, 2013.8.2 comments returned, overhaul, gave two months.The 2013.09.27 overhaul was uploaded and received at 2013.10.01.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted on July 4th, 2013, received feedback on August 2nd, extensive revisions were made, given two months. Final revised version uploaded on September 27th, 2013, and accepted on October 1st

(0) 讚！ | 七星之雁

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2683

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Pay attention to the details

(0) 讚！ | 狮吼嘉勋

Follow the attention

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

It's bullish. If it goes up again tomorrow, there is a chance to break through 3 points

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

1 month review. The comments of the first reviewer were difficult to answer. Careful revision got it accepted. Relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Electrophoresis journals cover articles in both biological and chemical directions, so it would be easier to reverse the table if they were able to combine the two.Self-perception, ELECTROPHORESIS reviewers pay more attention to theoretical analysis and derivation, so in addition to the article needs to have new surprises, a sound theoretical analysis will increase the chances of winning the bid.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

ElectrophoresisJournal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submission year: 2008.11 Review cycle: 3 times in total 4 months Whether major or minor revisions required: 1 major revision - 1 minor revision - acceptance Time from submission to acceptance: 4 months for proteomics articles Request for language polishing during the process: None Are page charges required: Yes, for pages exceeding a certain limit Personal comments (perceptions or experiences): The language requirements do not seem very high, the reviews are thorough, and there is usually a response within 20-30 days after submission. The article needs to have some novelty (especially in electrophoresis methods

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁