Received 16 October 2017Received in revised form 21 February 2018Accepted 23 February 2018

(0) 讚！ | llxs

Received 16 October 2017Received in revised form 21 February 2018Accepted 23 February 2018

(0) 讚！ | llxs

Don't select for an urgent article, too slow, no results for a few months.

(0) 讚！ | fqfnh

Don't select for an urgent article, too slow,I haven’t got results in a few months.

(0) 讚！ | fqfnh

Don't select for an urgent article, too slow, no results for a few months.

(0) 讚！ | fqfnh

agrees that the upstairs journal editor seems to be very busy, and the fall of this journal does not seem to make no sense.The review comments returned after one month, and after the repair, they were put on hold for 50 days in the editor's hands.Less than an hour after the draft is changed to under review, and received after half a month.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

has submitted a current manuscript that has been accepted. Personally, the review speed is still very fast, but the editor of this journal seems to be very busy. The time for editing and processing the manuscript is a bit long, overall it is stillVery fast, submitted on September 2nd, returned to the major overhaul on October 14th, returned to the revised draft on October 24th, accepted on November 12th, more than two months

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Toxic EcologyThe review period is relatively long, and both experts have proposed amendments. After receiving it for a week or so after the repair, the impact factor has dropped.

(0) 讚！ | chuifanzhou

I selectd last year, reviewing the draft for 5 months, it’s too long, there is no big problem except the language, it’s a minor repair, I didn’t expect the impact factor to fall.2.3.Tragedy.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is the study of the biologic and toxic effects of natural or synthetic chemical pollutants on animal, plant, or microbial

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage: http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/10646

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

selectd in July last year, closed in NovemberTo the rejection letter, the opinions of the two judges, one pointed out the small mistake, the other pointed out an obvious loophole; because the deputy editor gave a good evaluation of the article, and later applied for a re-submitment, and agreed.According to the opinions of the two judges (including the loophole mentioned above), the re-submitment in February this year was rejected in June, saying that it did not meet the requirements of the journal.It feels that although the influence of the article is high (about 3.5), the influence in the field of toxicology is still not as good as Aquatic toxicology, toxoclogy letter and so on.It is more difficult, especially for Chinese people, and there are very few Chinese articles accepted each year.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Good coverage about  many aspects of pollutant studies, biochemical, molecular, physical and functional hazards, biomarker testing , toxicity test, environmental risk assessment, etc.

(3) 讚！ | 匿名