The revised manuscript has been submitted, a little slow, the state continues editor assignment pending.

(0) 讚！ | 159

3 month review. Half year of revision yielded a substantially different manuscript. The overall feeling of the journal is that the review speed is slow, but the reviewers are strict. Not recommended if you need very fast publication.

(5) 讚！ | 285339159@qq.com

My article review speed is very fast, submitted to the online journal for exactly 5 months, I feel that as long as there are some innovations, it is still relatively easy!But it is really level!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Helps FORUM OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY(The original link can not open ah)

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, the second modification has been returned for more than half a month, the state is still Editor Assignment Pending, depressed.Is the editor very busy?The draft will not be processed.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Japan really has no hatred for us, even the submissions are like this, and there is deep feeling of the same, those who are screaming for Japanese friendship to touch the conscience

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

first trial for more than 4 months to the news, overhaul; change 1 month later, 1 month to the message minor repair; then 1 month to send a letter to ask the results, said to receive.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A journal in Japan, in general, is very strict, and the review period is relatively long. Two reviewers, one agrees to accept, one objection, and finally refuses, the wholeThe process is about 6 months, it is recommended to carefully consider before submitting!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing speed is slow

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

期刊网页网站: http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/ecology/journal/11284

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A classmate was tried three times as ifAfter the second basic change to the third time, it was confirmed that the document was not internationally rejected. It can prove that it is absolutely international because I was one of the authors who changed it for him (he seems to have a year before and after). Japan basically does not.I said that I have selectd for another Japanese. I don’t have any good feelings.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

bimonthly, review time is relatively long, basically inMore than half a year, recently published an article above, the factor is more than 1 point, it is recommended not to select this journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Japanese Ecological Society journal, the points are not high, generally between 1~2, articlesThe overall grade is not very high, but the requirements are strict. If there is an objection to the three reviewers, the article will not be accepted.It turned out that one of the lab's brothers had submitted the manuscript, and the two reviewers had a good opinion, but the third reviewer objected, and the final article was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名