23.11.29 under review

(0) 讚！ | 陈小龙

On November 22, 2023, with editor

(0) 讚！ | 陈小龙

The first two characters of my name are also "Guo Qing".

(0) 讚！ | Analysis68

Mine also, it's been 8 months, coughing up blood.

(0) 讚！ | badminton

So slow... I give up, under review for 9 months...

(7) 讚！ | Accepted_sci

It was a journal that I particularly want to submit to. The old journal in ecology field has a low impact factor, but I feel that it is potential. This year, it has become the Q2 in the category. I hope it will continue to stabilize. The manuscript was submitted on December 26, 2019, and the review comments were received on May 1, 2020, and accepted on July 3, which took a little longer time, which may because of epidemic. But it's already pretty good.

(5) 讚！ | nie35786

My paper was once accepted by the journal. Comments were received until 6 months of the first review later; it was also said in the editor’s reply that reviewers were hard to find (he had changed 2 or 3 reviewers who did not respond or refused review). When there were not so many journals in ecology (by 2010), this was a very good journal with very classic papers (for example, MaxEnt was from here). The quality is now seriously declining, and it is estimated that it has fallen into a vicious circle of failure to improve: IF not high—no good paper source—IF cannot be improved. Comments from a foreign research laboratory partner: If you have an article with a new perspective, new method, and new result, then submit to journals like Ecology Letters. If the perspective is not new, the method is a bit new, and the result is not new, then submit to Ecological Modelling.

(2) 讚！ | ahaha233

It was under review for six months, I urged once in the period, I was told that more than a dozen reviewers rejected the review, one agreed to review it, and the other did not give the feedback. I received the comments from one reviewer after August; the editor looked good and gave it a major revision based on a reviewer's comments. I submitted the revision in one month. Minor revision was given after review, and it was accepted in two days after the revision was submitted. It's really hard to find reviewers for this journal. I have seen people who have experienced the same as me.

(0) 讚！ | ys

was rejected for more than 6 months. The editor said that 26 reviewers were found and refused to review.Anxious to graduate....What can I say?..

(1) 讚！ | cangture

Under Review More than 5 months....Can you email me?It seems that I have to be prepared for rejection.

(0) 讚！ | cangture@gmail.com

Focus on the model of this journal, and there is an Ecological Indicator with this one, but the focus is on indicators.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

3 months for first review! Focused on system ecology, ecological models and sustainability.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

journal is of high quality.The review speed is faster, because it is a half-monthly journal, the publishing speed is very fast.Submitted for three and a half months for overhaul, and repaired three months later, directly received.The editor is very focused on research attitudes.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Edit is still very good, but the impact factor is still relatively low, it should be relatively easy

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

two months to minor review, modify the day after acceptance.Good journals, emphasis on mathematics, and of course ecological meaning.Impact factor (2010, IF5=2.44), below the level of this journal.The general review will take three months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Economic field is very good journal biasModel

(0) 讚！ | 匿名