My system date changed on April 12th once, still under review. However, there are no new reviewers invited or accepted in the Track system, and the date is still stuck in March. Your situation should be similar

(0) 讚！ | 油气终结者

I did not find any information about inviting reviewers or elevating results

(1) 讚！ | 深处

I was also updated under review on Mar 16, but the editor invited another person to review the manuscript. However, that person did not accept the invitation, so the process has been delayed until now. Has the editor found another reviewer to look at your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 油气终结者

Mar 16 update
Apr 6 update

(0) 讚！ | 深处

Mar 16 update
APR 6 update

(0) 讚！ | 深处

Only one reviewer has been invited in a month, and the review has not been accepted yet

(0) 讚！ | 油气终结者

Submitted on January 28, 2024
Under review as of February 13, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 深处

The same day, Track showed 2 submitted for review, accepted 1, completed 1. I don't know why someone accepted and completed the review so quickly

(0) 讚！ | 油气终结者

Submitted today and under review with the editor for two weeks. Good luck for the revision!

(0) 讚！ | 油气终结者

Submitted on February 8, with editor on February 18, and there has been no response since. Is this journal always this slow?

(1) 讚！ | 油气终结者

I received an invitation from the German editor Reinhard Miller and wrote a review

(1) 讚！ | 匿名123456

May I ask if the paper you submitted is a direct submission or if a proposal is required beforehand?

(0) 讚！ | XueYao

Very efficient, not very "funny", made a typo.

(0) 讚！ | Azure

Two rounds of review, each taking one month. The reviewers have a high level of expertise, are meticulous and rigorous, and the revisions are somewhat challenging and time-consuming. However, this improves the quality and ultimately leads to publication.

(0) 讚！ | Azure

The journal reviewers were very efficient, and the comments provided by the editors and reviewers were extremely valuable. It took some time to thoroughly revise the manuscript, and the suggestions greatly contributed to improving the quality of the paper!
1.7 Submitted to Journal
1.14 Under Review
2.2 Under Review Update
2.23 Required Reviews Completed
2.24 Revise
4.28 Submitted
4.28 Under Review
5.3 Required Reviews Completed
5.5 Revise
7.1 Revision Submitted to Journal
7.8 Under Review
7.31 Accept
8.2 Available online

(0) 讚！ | Azure

Hello, may I ask how long after submission will it be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 西瓜里的西瓜子

I am fortunate to have two review articles published on ADVCIS. The editorial team processed the manuscripts quickly, and the reviewers' comments were pertinent and reasonable, which significantly improved the quality of the articles. I hope the journal will continue to thrive.

(0) 讚！ | wxinseu

The message given in 2 days, the reply was slightly hurtful. "I do not think that the authors' research experience can support such a review and present a critical review on this topic..."

(0) 讚！ | 匿名用户否

Authors who can publish papers in this journal are generally recognized experts in the field of colloid or interface worldwide. The acceptance rate for articles in this journal in 2021 is 24%. There is statistical data on Peipus Academic's website: https://www.peipusci.com/news/518.html.

(24) 讚！ | 见好就收

The colloids and interfaces journal has the highest impact factor and publishing papers in it establishes one as a recognized expert in the field. The articles in this journal are normally authored by the recognized experts.

(0) 讚！ | 见好就收

That Australian Chinese is very terrible!!!

(1) 讚！ | keyan

A review journal with an impact factor of only 12.9, and still wanting to be in the top tier, what are they thinking?

(0) 讚！ | carpenter

8.29, submission; 9.9, under review; the status date changed three times during the period. Excuse me, is this because no reviewer was found?

(0) 讚！ | 必中欧耶

more than three weeks with editors, and i did not recieve any decision yet

(0) 讚！ | 18115179692@163.com

more than three weeks with editors, and i did not recieve ant decision yet

(0) 讚！ | 18115179692@163.com