Please provide the template for the Ecohydrology journal.

(0) 讚！ | nieying

What status indicates that the document is ready for submission?

(0) 讚！ | Cchou

Silly journal, rejected by the editor for over a month, don't want to lose face

(0) 讚！ | 真特么难搞

It has been submitted for review, waiting for news, the first review is estimated to be more than 2 months

(0) 讚！ | 嘻-嘻

Hello, how does this journal define when a submission is under review? It has been almost a month since I have been in the "In Review" status

(0) 讚！ | WOYAOFALUNWEN

Excuse me, is the editor the chief editor? The chief editor of this journal is quite good. After the first review, it took two months, but after the revisions, it was accepted directly in a few days.

(0) 讚！ | 嘻-嘻

This journal is so abnormal. The review process is too slow. I submitted it in February 2021 and received the first round of review comments in August. What's even more unreasonable is the rejection. There were two reviewers, one suggesting minor revisions and the other suggesting major revisions, but the editor-in-chief unexpectedly rejected it with insufficient reasons. The impact factor is only slightly above 2, which is too low. I don't plan to appeal either.

(0) 讚！ | 遥感人

Overall, it was very pleasant. Online for 19 days after receiving.

(71) 讚！ | 嘻-嘻

There are very few suitable journals for papers on ecohydrology. Ecohydrology is considered a minor field, with ecohdyrology being the number one journal in this area. The initial review process took over two months, with comments for major revisions provided by two reviewers. After resubmission, the paper was quickly re-evaluated and accepted. Overall, the process of submitting the paper was relatively pleasant.

(0) 讚！ | 鹏程万里

May I ask how long will it take to be online after receiving?

(0) 讚！ | 可可

20210202 Submission
20210618 Received feedback from Xiao Xiu
20210620 R1
20210701 Accepted
Feeling that the editor is very responsible, there was no news about the article for a while. Sent an email to the editor and received a quick reply.

(0) 讚！ | 可可

The first scientific paper of my life, although it was rejected two months after submission, the editor was serious and responsible, and the specific and detailed revision suggestions provided by the reviewers were of great help to my paper.

(1) 讚！ | 璇璇zx

It is a very good journal in the eco-hydrology industry, and obviously better than JoH, HP, and AWR. An article was submitted to Ecohydrology after being rejected by JoH and JES. The review speed was very fast. The first review took two and a half months. Both reviewers required major revisions. There were not many comments. We responded to them carefully one by one, and it was directly accepted 12 days after resubmission.

(0) 讚！ | Dr. B

The journal is good, but the review speed is very slow. It took a whole year from the first submission to the final acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | Hopfield

Relatively slow and rigorous.

(0) 讚！ | aquaph

The first journal of ecological hydrology2 revisions, final acceptanceThe editor is very serious, personally modify the grammarUnfortunately, it is estimated that the manpower is not enough, very very slow, from submission to acceptance for about 2 years, published another year

(3) 讚！ | hzjohnson@qq.com

Invested a draft, revised the second trial, the second trial has no direct comments.However, it is very, very slow, 10 months for the first trial and 10 months for the second trial. Of course, I have changed it for 10 months, which is almost three years.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名