11.1 Submission 
11.14 Editor review 
11.28 External review 
12.6 Update on external review 
1.5 Minor revisions requested 
1.10 Acceptance after revisions 
1.16 Online 
1.18 Proofreading 
1.30 Published

Overall, the process was quite balanced and the feedback for revisions was detailed, correcting grammar and word errors. The reviewer seems to be an expert in metabolism, providing additional information on pharmacokinetics. The acceptance after revisions was prompt on the same day. As long as the quality of the article is ensured, it shouldn't be too difficult

(0) 讚！ | yee4731

After being rejected twice after submission, they are still welcome to submit again.
After the third submission, they were directly hired without being reviewed again.
It's quite mysterious.
I hope the child can work harder to improve and rise again.

(0) 讚！ | cecilia-y

Stuck at this juncture, it's not easy to push forward anymore. At over 4 points, it's considered satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

This is a traditional journal in the field. Our manuscript went through two rounds of revisions. Both rounds took one month to receive the reviews and then a few weeks or so to complete the revisions. The reviewers’ comments were harsh but pertinent… submitting to journals with reputations like this one aren’t easy.

(0) 讚！ | 409296492@qq.com

One month for the first review, with comments for major revisions from two reviewers, then one week for revisions and comments for minor revisions from two other reviewers. Accepted after one month, and published one week later in a prestigious journal. It's not easy

(0) 讚！ | 五郎梓奥

Journal Homepage URL: http://informahealthcare.com/dmr

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I think as long as the quality of the article meets the standard and is useful for future researchers, it can be accepted. There are already 2 articles published in this journal, both with minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁