The review process after submission is very slow. First, the office reviewed the format, even though it was done according to the guide for authors, they said it did not meet the requirements. After making the corrections and resubmitting, it took a long time for the review to finally come. After eagerly awaiting the reviewer's comments, there were suggestions for revisions that seemed to be a mix of major and minor changes. I carefully responded and made the revisions, thinking it would be accepted soon, but then the editor requested another round of reviews, leading to another couple of months of waiting. One of the three reviewers suggested additional experiments, while the other two requested citations to their own papers. The editor ultimately rejected the submission. It's frustrating. The whole process took over four months. For a journal in the fourth quartile, unless it's a student project, I will definitely not submit again

(0) 讚！ | guahan

The common types of SCI articles include Article, Letter, Comments, Review, Protocol, and Review

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Common types of articles include Article, Letter, Comments, Review, Protocol, and Essay

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the types of SCI articles?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

What are the common types of SCI articles?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0Experience Sharing: Don't submit in a hurry if you are eager to graduate. The editor-in-chief lacks determination, and the reviewers are slow. It takes 2-3 months for the review process, and even minor changes to images and text can take 1-2 months for a response. This magazine is very irresponsible. After going back and forth 3 times, it took me 6-7 months to get accepted. I've been waiting for the proof for 2 months, and it still hasn't been generated. I have no idea when it will be published. A very, very irresponsible magazine. Extremely slow publication. It is difficult to graduate if not submitted at least 1 year in advance

(0) 讚！ | Penelope Sinclair

Review speed: 6.0 | Acceptance rate: 75.0
Sharing experience: If you are in a hurry to graduate, please do not submit to this journal. The editor-in-chief lacks initiative and the reviewers are very slow. I have been waiting for over 6 months, and even for simple changes to text or images, it takes 1-2 months for a response. This journal is very irresponsible

(0) 讚！ | Penelope Sinclair

Don't submit your article to this magazine if you are eager to graduate. The editor-in-chief lacks decisiveness and the reviewers are very slow. I have been waiting for over 6 months for their response, and even simple changes to pictures and text take 1-2 months to be approved. This magazine is very irresponsible

(0) 讚！ | Penelope Sinclair

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted a paper, Received 14 September 2011; revised 16 November 2011; accepted 31 March 2012, and it was finally published in 2013. The publication speed is extremely slow, and the number of articles published each year is very limited. If you are in a hurry to graduate, please do not submit your article to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 五郎琳瑜

The external audit has been going on for 2 months now, and we still haven't received any feedback

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It has been 2 months since the external audit, but we still haven't received any news

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Just submitted a paper recently, the content includes the IC50 of our drug on cancer cells, normal cells, the survival rate of acute toxicity in mice, LD50, and pathological sections of major organs. The submission system prompts us that due to the large increase in submissions recently, authors should wait patiently until October to resubmit. We submitted it right before the October holiday, so we didn't pay too much attention to it. But one month after the review, we received a rejection, with the reason being that the workload is too small

(0) 讚！ | 妙音小仙女

Trashy magazine, doesn't matter, just submit it first and then we'll talk

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Heavy research focus: Toxicology

(0) 讚！ | 松雨小娘子