Decide whether to submit within 2 weeks

(0) 讚！ | shenyang7788

When can we submit for review?

(0) 讚！ | Beryl Lily

How long does it usually take for the submission to be reviewed in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 回风念雁

Very good magazine, very difficult to submit. The first review had comments on nearly 10 pages, and it took 3 months to conduct additional experiments. Then a minor revision was made during the second review, and finally it was accepted.

(17) 讚！ | 勤奋的Creloxp

Does anyone know the status process for submissions for this magazine? Thank you all!

(0) 讚！ | 终幕巧凝

How long does it take for submissions to be sent for review? Thank you everyone!!!

(0) 讚！ | 终幕巧凝

It's true that there is no loss. It's risky to go through another round of Nature Science. If we miss the deadline, we won't be able to submit to DC. It's better to seize the opportunity in front of us

(0) 讚！ | 邻家飞跃

According to the requirements of the respective magazines, write in the appropriate format. If there is no fixed format, choose a suitable format according to the type of article. Regardless of the format, structuring the abstract makes the data information clearer and more understandable

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Abstract is a summary of the content of the paper, mainly indicating the purpose of the paper, the methods used, and the results and significance obtained

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write an abstract?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

How to choose between structured and full-text abstracts?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

The Bull is so admirable

(0) 讚！ | 桃花瑞丹

Popularity is indeed very important

(0) 讚！ | 法慧和同

Sharing a submission experience, a paper for Nature Communications, the first major project Boss Qingqian came back to do, took almost 4 years, mainly focusing on mechanotransduction. Submitted to Cell, received major revisions, with nearly 100 comments, Boss was very pleased and insisted on resubmitting. After working on it for another 3 months, it was resubmitted, and the editor thought it was good, but mentioned that there have been a lot of similar articles recently, suggesting to transfer it to Developmental Cell. Boss had a postdoc who published in Developmental Cell before, so he immediately agreed, but if the corresponding author was from a foreign lab, Cell would probably have accepted it. Editors still prioritize specific names

(0) 讚！ | 终幕胤运

Publishing in top journals is not easy, but it's a pity that the field is too traditional. The Cell series of journals have their own unique attributes, making it a bit self-indulgent

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞倚轩

The top journal in development, publishing a paper there is not easy. Unfortunately, this field is too traditional, a bit of a struggle. The Cell series also comes with a troublesome attribute, so it feels a bit self-indulgent

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞倚轩

Nature Communications: 73591/(6721+15) = 10.925  Science Advances: 6814/(726+15) = 9.195  Developmental Cell:  3635/(372+38) = 8.865  PNAS: 55771/6468 = 8.622  Cell Reports: 13710/1866 = 7.347  eLife:  13222/1979 = 6.681

(0) 讚！ | 宇荫mm

8-10 points is already very good. As long as this level is maintained in the long term, it is an internationally first-class journal

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

3825/423=9.04

(0) 讚！ | 宇荫mm

3710/423=8.77

(0) 讚！ | 宇荫mm

3368/423=7.962  The IF continues to decrease in 2016

(0) 讚！ | 宇荫mm

IF=9.708, the latest

(0) 讚！ | 香风宛菡

3395/404=8.4

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

3329/404=8.24

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

developmental cell's bear market is expected to continue, with the same fate as plant cell   
developmental cell: 3214/404 = 7.955  
nature communications: 19750/2297 =8.598  
cell reports: 4720/717 =6.58  
NAR:  
19192/2743 = 6.997  
plant cell:  
4757/640 = 7.43  
11 points? No way!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁