The initial review was very fast, receiving an email within a week. I initially thought it was a rejection, but it turned out to be two sets of reviewer comments requiring major revisions.

After adding supplementary literature, expanding the content, and making modifications, I resubmitted the revised manuscript, expecting good news soon. However, it has been over half a month now and it still shows "With Editor"... it's truly been a rollercoaster ride.

May 19, 2024 - With Editor
May 20, 2024 - Out for Review
May 27, 2024 - Decision Pending
May 27, 2024 - Revision Required
June 30, 2024 - Revised Manuscript Submitted

(0) 讚！ | superceng

May I ask if there is any feedback given to the reviewer after the major revision? Have you received any new review messages, or did the editor directly confirm it?

(0) 讚！ | 东西梦梦

2022.8.15 - Suggestions for modification - Major overhaul
2022 9.13 - Return
2022.9.23 - Agree to receive

(0) 讚！ | 左岸Nancy

2022.6.26 submit
2022.6.28 with editor
2022.6.29 out for review 
Looking forward to receiving feedback around the end of July.

(0) 讚！ | 左岸Nancy

CRAC is a decent journal; the impact factor has risen in recent years. The reviewers’ comments are always pertinent, thorough and professional. The review cycle has become faster; it is typical that the first round of revisions are received around one month after submission. There is a bit of self-citation – the editors recommend that authors who submit their manuscripts to CRAC refer to the CRAC literature.

(1) 讚！ | 651287561@qq.com