In the field of mineralogy and petrology, CMP is considered the top journal. In terms of petrology alone, the content included in CMP and JP are both top-notch, but their styles differ. Overall, the articles in CMP are slightly shorter in length compared to those in JP

(0) 讚！ | peak

Under review in just one week, if there are year-end holidays, it may be slower.

(0) 讚！ | 美国政府将

Excuse me, how long did it take for your article to be accepted for submission?

(0) 讚！ | nur

May I ask, how many days did your paper stay in the "New Submission" status?

(0) 讚！ | nur

After submission, it takes one week for review. Three months later, the comments from the first review are returned. The major revisions are suggested by two reviewers. Actually, the reviewers' comments are quite acceptable, but the editor-in-chief added many very tricky suggestions. It took a lot of effort to modify the editor-in-chief's suggestions, but even after making the changes, the editor-in-chief was still not satisfied and added some very tricky suggestions again. After honestly making the modifications according to the editor-in-chief's suggestions, the editor-in-chief was satisfied and accepted it directly. The editor-in-chief's strict review process clearly greatly improves the quality of articles published in CMP.

(0) 讚！ | 美国政府将

CMP is considered a classic journal in the field of solid rock and mineralogy, and it is highly recognized in the industry, second only to the top journal of petrology in rock science. The editors and reviewers of CMP are all renowned experts or emerging talents in the field, and their opinions are highly regarded. The only drawback is that articles in CMP mainly focus on fundamental rock and mineralogy research, lacking novelty, and it is almost impossible to be selected for NI journals. Therefore, in the current research evaluation system in China (which emphasizes NI articles), traditional solid earth science research is at a disadvantage, which is truly regrettable...

(4) 讚！ | 千手柱间91

A top journal in the field of geosciences, the direction and quality of the articles received equals to Journal of Petrology American Mineralogists Economic Geology (±Chemical Geology).

(16) 讚！ | 比度

A top journal in the field of traditional solid rocks. Although the impact factor has not been raised, who cares?!

(22) 讚！ | 一枚岩石地化虫

The articles in this journal are of a high level and are highly recognized throughout the geosciences.Specific to the journals in the field of petrology, the quality is second only to the Journal of petrology, the top journal in the field of petrology, which is much higher than journals such as Lithos.

(0) 讚！ | 学术狗

This journal has received fewer Chinese articles and has a long review time. It is not recommended that everyone select in a very anxious situation.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

This journal is second only to the J of Petrology. In my opinion, this journal should be rated higher than another competing journal, Lithos. The editor for CMAP handled the manuscript efficiently and professionally. Prior to submission, I recommend that authors check the word count on their articles – CMAP doesn’t publish long papers.

(5) 讚！ | 匿名