The external audit has concluded and it is now back in the hands of the editors. The status has been DIP from November 6th to November 14th, tense, awaiting revisions

(3) 讚！ | 文章全中

I have also cast my vote, hoping for good luck in the field of orthopedics

(0) 讚！ | 文章全中

Why does it take so long in the hands of the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 文章全中

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasized research direction: connective tissue Experience sharing: It takes about 1.5 months from submission to external review, with 2 expert reviewers. The first reviewer raised 10 questions, the second reviewer raised 19 questions. After revisions, the manuscript was re-reviewed and 3 questions were asked by each reviewer. After another round of revisions and re-review, the first reviewer had no further questions, but the second reviewer raised another 19 questions related to grammar and wording, and ultimately rejected the manuscript. The whole process took 3-4 months in total. It feels frustrating, as initially it seemed that the manuscript would be accepted after addressing just 3 questions from each reviewer. However, it turned out to be very frustrating as the second reviewer raised another 19 questions, leading to a continuous loop of questioning that seems impossible to break. Frustrating journal, frustrating expert, feeling that the editor and expert are very irresponsible and not appreciative of the modifications made by the authors. Furthermore, I am already tired of this submission mechanism. What does multiple submissions mean? It is a mechanism that bullies people. Manuscripts should be allowed to be submitted multiple times. If a journal is quick to respond and accepts the submission, then it should be submitted to that journal. The current situation makes us very passive, submitting one journal after another, which wastes a lot of our time

(0) 讚！ | 耶达坎普

How do you handle addressing the cover letter to an organization?

(0) 讚！ | 一阳星华

5.10 Submission
5.17 Review
6.6 Feedback received, one of the reviewers provided two comments, the associate editor made five major revisions and four minor revisions, and the revised version was returned after one month. The reviewers and the editor were very professional and had a very friendly attitude.
7.12 Returned for further revisions
7.14 Sent for external review
7.15 Waiting for a decision
7.18 Accepted
It was quite surprising to be able to submit for review at that time, as the publication rate is usually very low.

(11) 讚！ | Kevin Cui

May I ask what is the organization's name that should be addressed on the cover letter?

(0) 讚！ | 五河秋莲

Introduction focuses on identifying the unresolved problems and the innovative or valuable aspects of the research. The Discussion section requires a detailed comparison and analysis of the results of one's own research with previous findings. The emphasis of the two differs

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

There are many ways to write an introduction, but the general rule is to simply describe the problem

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Introduction and discussion can be written without repeating each other

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

How is writing an introduction different from having a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

The new system may still have With Journal Administrator inside

(0) 讚！ | 小上章吖

How long has it been since there was a change?

(0) 讚！ | 小上章吖

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: skeletal muscle injury; signal pathway
Experience sharing: Submitted at the end of January, revised in early March, accepted in April, online version on May 20th

(0) 讚！ | 余馥少女

How fast are you going?

(0) 讚！ | 是你的相勤呀

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Focus on research area: Surgery; Orthopedic Experience sharing: Editors are friendly, review comments are very fair, worth submitting

(0) 讚！ | Emmanuel Charles

Why is it still "with journal administrator" after half a month?

(0) 讚！ | 上清锦玉

It's good, the editor is friendly, as long as the data in the article is sufficient, there should be no problem

(0) 讚！ | 四风小强

What happened later?

(0) 讚！ | Roberta Bradley

Have you visited his house? How was it? Looking for some opinions, thank you ?

(0) 讚！ | Roberta Bradley

No layout fee.
South Wind 2020-04-24 00:00:00 Post: May I ask how much the layout fee is? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 四风小强

Excuse me, how much is the fee for this section, seniors? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 邻家珮青

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted in October 2019, first round of external review in January, major revision (requested to add more experiments), added most of the experiments. Second round of external review in February, major revision (language and discussion section issues, should be considered minor revision), returned in 10 days, but sent for external review again. This editor is speechless, do reviewers like to see the same article three times? It is now March 19, 2020, still under external review. Please be cautious when submitting! For a journal with an impact factor of 2.1, a large amount of mechanistic experiments is required. If there are no mechanisms, it is not recommended to submit to this journal. Also, for those in a rush to graduate, it is not advisable to submit here. Multiple rounds of review, each slower than the last, will delay graduation, too slow

(0) 讚！ | 江南飞阳

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The submission response is very fast. Within one month, the revised manuscript is reviewed. The editor is very responsible and helps with language editing

(0) 讚！ | 宗室曼萱

From less than 1.5 points, it is now close to 2 points, which is a good sign. This magazine is worth having

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁