Hello! I am planning to submit to this journal, and I noticed that the submission requirements include providing a list of 8 potential reviewers, among other restrictions. I wanted to ask, how strict is the editorial department about this? Because the second author has many collaborators, so if we have to avoid them all, it will be difficult to provide a list of potential reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 初入数学界的小学生

After the required reviews for the second round have been completed, is there any decision in process? How long does the decision in process usually last? My status has been pending for 10 days without any news

(0) 讚！ | 跪求论文录用

After the second review, the status changed to "required reviews completed." Ten days later, it became "decision in process." Has anyone experienced this situation before? Is this a sign of rejection or something else? How long does it usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 跪求论文录用

Indeed slow, regardless of major or minor repairs, opinions are sought every three months

(0) 讚！ | 兽兽

Thank you for your clarification, I appreciate your kind words, and I wish you success in your endeavors!

(0) 讚！ | 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊

Hello, I have been rejected and now have applied elsewhere. Your reviewer has increased from two to five, and there is a theory that responses from two reviewers are either both positive or one positive and one negative. Therefore, the editor wants to invite more reviewers to confirm, so I personally think the probability of acceptance is high. Good luck to you

(0) 讚！ | 单壮

Do you have any progress on your article? I just submitted it over 2 months ago, originally only had two reviewers, but suddenly became five yesterday

(0) 讚！ | XJNU CY

Posted on March 23rd
Sent for review on April 4th

The current results are unknown, it shows that there are two reviewers, waiting for one to come back.

(0) 讚！ | 单壮

Return for repair on May 8, 2023.5.24 final acceptance. It was online within ten days after acceptance, which was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | zlm

Submitted in February of the 22nd year, went through three rounds of revisions, and finally got accepted in June of the 23rd year. It was quite difficult.

(7) 讚！ | tju

This journal has a relatively high quality, and its impact factor has significantly increased in recent years. It is not excellent, but it is a top-level core journal in the 2nd tier this year. However, it is not clear about the latest Chinese Academy of Sciences classification in December. The review process is not very fast.

(5) 讚！ | tangshp

Returned for repair on April 20th, currently still with editor.

(0) 讚！ | LAS

Do any of you have recently sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 啊！

Boss, what's the result? Can I share some good luck?

(0) 讚！ | tju

2022.11.25 under review - 2022.12.18 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | Rfem

This journal is a bit slow.
Submitted on 8.18
Under review on 9.19
Under review on 9.22
Required reviews completed on 11.16
Required reviews completed on 11.25

(0) 讚！ | zlm

2022.4.13 submitted
2022.6.10 under review
2022.9.26 revise
2022.9.27 with editor
2022.11.25 under review
2022.12.18 Required Reviews Completed
2023.2.11 Accept

The first article took nearly ten months from submission to acceptance. I am grateful that it was successful.

(0) 讚！ | Rfem

Hello, OP, I am an expert in optimization algorithms and I would like to give this a try. I feel that my paper may have some minor innovative aspects, but I am a bit hesitant to attempt it. Can you please share some insights on the difficulty level?

(0) 讚！ | Annia

5 reviewers! 5 reviewers! 5 reviewers! One gave major revisions, three gave very positive evaluations, and one gave a mediocre evaluation. Currently still making revisions, hoping for acceptance! However, when my supervisor saw the 5 reviewers, they were all puzzled... This journal is probably aiming for a high impact factor, I really hope it gets accepted! Ahhhhhh!

(0) 讚！ | BigBigBigQ

2021.12.31 submit
2022.04.16 minor revision
2022.05.07 submit
2022.07.08 accept
Overall, the process was quite fast. Previously, my submission to JCP was rejected by one of the reviewers, so it was a bit unfortunate. However, it's a bit of a waste to have my paper accepted by CMA just after graduating. It doesn't really serve any purpose. Haha.

(1) 讚！ | Hyman_XJTU

So slow, both reviewers haven't given any feedback yet. So slow, they don't even know how to send an email.

(0) 讚！ | tju

2021.11.7 Submitted
2021.11.29 Under Review
2021.12.30 Under Review
2022.5.9 Revise and Re-review
2022.5.16 With Editor
2022.6.27 Accept
The first review was too slow, maybe because one reviewer kept delaying...

(0) 讚！ | 老天让我毕业吧

I have been under review for 20 days already, and it has been five months, but I am still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 幸子

Why is the review process of this journal a bit slow? I saw that you submitted it for review half a month ago, and I haven't submitted it yet after half a month. Will it be rejected directly? Please hurry up, it's troublesome.

(0) 讚！ | tju

2021.1.18 submitted
2021.2.1 under review
2021.4.7 revise
2021.6.30 accept

Initially, this journal was recommended by teachers in the industry, and it had a good reputation in my field. I particularly enjoy reading algorithmic papers related to high-dimensional problems. Looking back now, the review process was relatively slow but still acceptable. I hope this information is helpful to everyone. PS: The decision in progress is very slow...

(8) 讚！ | 幺力